Closed cherryWangY closed 1 week ago
source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_t.py (6)
`1681-1702`: **Ensure correctness of forward function testing.** The forward function test checks the shape and value closeness of the result tensor. Confirm that the assertions are robust enough to catch potential discrepancies in the operation's output. --- `1704-1749`: **Review backward function testing for completeness.** The backward function test checks the gradients' shapes and values. Ensure that these tests are comprehensive and cover all scenarios that might affect gradient computation. --- `436-1507`: **Validate tensor reshaping and gradient settings.** The tensors are reshaped and their gradient settings are explicitly defined. Confirm that the reshaping dimensions and gradient requirements are as expected for the operation being tested.Verification successful
--- The gradient settings for the tensors in the provided code snippet are consistent with other tests in the repository. Specifically, the `requires_grad` attribute is set correctly for the tensors used in the tests. - `self.table_info_tensor.requires_grad = False` - `self.table_tensor.requires_grad = False` - `self.em_x_tensor.requires_grad = True` These settings align with the expected behavior for gradient computations in the tests.--- `23-27`: **Check precision setting for floating point comparisons.** The precision settings are different for `float64` and `float32` types. Ensure that these precision levels are appropriate and consistent with other tests in the project. --- `18-19`: **Check conditional test skipping logic.** The test is skipped if `ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP` is false. Ensure that this is the intended behavior, especially if this operation is crucial and should be tested regardless of the configuration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify tensor reshaping and gradient settings. # Test: Check for gradient settings consistency in other tests. rg --type python 'requires_grad =' 'source/tests' ``` Length of output: 80 --- --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify tensor reshaping and gradient settings. # Test: Check for gradient settings consistency in other tests. rg --type py 'requires_grad =' source/tests ``` Length of output: 1550Verification successful
--- The `ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP` conditional test skipping logic is consistently used across multiple test files, indicating that it is an intended behavior. - `source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_t.py` - `source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_r.py` - `source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_a.py` - `source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_atten.py` This confirms that the approach to skip tests when `ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP` is not enabled is consistent and likely intentional.--- `28-424`: **Check tensor initialization and reshape operations.** The tensor is reshaped to (8, 174), resulting in a total of 1392 elements. Ensure that the tensor dimensions and the total number of elements are correctly calculated and aligned with the expected use in tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the condition for skipping tests. # Test: Search for `ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP` usage in other test files. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type python 'ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP' ``` Length of output: 70 --- --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the condition for skipping tests. # Test: Search for `ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP` usage in other test files. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type py 'ENABLE_CUSTOMIZED_OP' ``` Length of output: 1197Verification successful
--- The search results show numerous instances of tensor reshaping logic across various test files, including the file in question (`source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_t.py`). The specific line of interest, where the tensor is reshaped to `(8, 174)`, is explicitly found in the search results: ``` source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_t.py: ).reshape(8, 174) # 1392 ``` Given this, we can verify that the tensor reshaping logic is consistent and the dimensions align with the expected number of elements (8 * 174 = 1392). There is no evidence of a mismatch or inconsistency in the tensor dimensions or the total number of elements. - **File:** `source/tests/pt/test_tabulate_fusion_se_t.py` - **Line:** 424Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify tensor reshaping logic. # Test: Check for similar tensor reshaping logic in other tests or in the operation implementation. rg --type python 'reshape' 'source/tests' ``` Length of output: 70 --- --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify tensor reshaping logic. # Test: Check for similar tensor reshaping logic in other tests or in the operation implementation. rg 'reshape' --type py source/tests ``` Length of output: 117785
Attention: Patch coverage is 84.42029%
with 43 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 82.72%. Comparing base (
f9d5f56
) to head (7dd7f6a
).:exclamation: Current head 7dd7f6a differs from pull request most recent head 1523196
Please upload reports for the commit 1523196 to get more accurate results.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
source/op/pt/tabulate_multi_device.cc | 84.42% | 16 Missing and 27 partials :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@coderabbitai resolve
OP: tabulate_multi_device.cc -> tabulate_fusion_se_a & atten & r & t Compile: add compile file Test: source/tests, se_t has no test, and all other ops pass the forward and backward tests.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores