Closed hl2500 closed 5 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
18a0ed5
) 82.81% compared to head (ff29a85
) 82.99%. Report is 11 commits behind head on devel.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@CodiumAI-Agent /review --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true
๐ก General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and includes relevant tests for the new functionality. However, it would be beneficial to include more comments in the code to explain the logic and the purpose of the functions, especially for those unfamiliar with ORCA files.
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
About the 'Code feedback' sectionThe `review` tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested **only** in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the [`improve`](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/IMPROVE.md) feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the `review` tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well. |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_review`, `enable_review_labels_effort`, and more. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Persistent review updated to latest commit https://github.com/deepmodeling/dpdata/commit/ff29a85c1f7590a278978927a54392c6cb2efc14
@njzjz shall we remove the supported format table from the README and relies only on the automated format doc?
@njzjz shall we remove the supported format table from the README and relies only on the automated format doc?
I agree. Indeed, we also need to merge other parts.
Added support for ORCA single point energy files