deepmodeling / dpgen2

2nd generation of the Deep Potential GENerator
https://docs.deepmodeling.com/projects/dpgen2/
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
32 stars 24 forks source link

Fix: calling functions for the default value of argument. #253

Closed wanghan-iapcm closed 3 weeks ago

wanghan-iapcm commented 3 weeks ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago
Walkthrough ## Walkthrough The changes involve modifying the `__init__` methods of several classes across different files in the `dpgen2/superop` directory. The parameters `prep_config` and `run_config` have been updated from mandatory `dict` types to optional types, allowing them to accept `None`. Default values are initialized within the method to ensure they always hold a valid dictionary structure, enhancing parameter handling and flexibility. ## Changes | Files | Change Summary | |-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `dpgen2/superop/prep_run_calypso.py` | Changed `prep_config` and `run_config` from `dict` to `Optional[dict]` with default `None`. Initialization logic updated. | | `dpgen2/superop/prep_run_diffcsp.py` | Updated `prep_config` and `run_config` to `Optional[dict]`, now default to `None`, with conditional initialization. | | `dpgen2/superop/prep_run_dp_train.py` | Altered `prep_config` and `run_config` to `Optional[dict]` with default `None`; conditional initialization added. | | `dpgen2/superop/prep_run_fp.py` | Modified `prep_config` and `run_config` to `Optional[dict]` with default `None`, with subsequent initialization if `None`. | | `dpgen2/superop/prep_run_lmp.py` | Changed `prep_config` and `run_config` to `Optional[dict]` with default `None`, with conditional assignment for initialization. |

Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 496795124439fdd6508acc1e717cd16e8a49f514 and 710ae6b527baa4dc5cf565ab1dad26e5a81b8bbc.
Files selected for processing (5) * dpgen2/superop/prep_run_calypso.py (1 hunks) * dpgen2/superop/prep_run_diffcsp.py (1 hunks) * dpgen2/superop/prep_run_dp_train.py (1 hunks) * dpgen2/superop/prep_run_fp.py (1 hunks) * dpgen2/superop/prep_run_lmp.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
dpgen2/superop/prep_run_fp.py (1)
`55-60`: **LGTM! Verify the constructor usage in the codebase.** The changes to handle `prep_config` and `run_config` as `Optional[dict]` with `None` as a default value are approved. This approach prevents mutable default argument issues and enhances flexibility. Ensure that all instances where this constructor is called are updated to handle the `None` default appropriately. Run the following script to verify the constructor usage:
Verification successful --- **Constructor Usage Verified Successfully** The `PrepRunFp` constructor is used in multiple locations across the codebase, primarily in test files. These instances ensure that the `None` defaults for `prep_config` and `run_config` are handled appropriately. No further action is needed. - Locations: - `tests/test_dpgen_loop.py` - `tests/test_block_cl.py` - `tests/test_prep_run_vasp.py` - `tests/fp/test_abacus.py` - `tests/fp/test_cp2k.py` - `dpgen2/entrypoint/submit.py`
Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 $'PrepRunFp(' ``` Length of output: 107 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 'PrepRunFp\(' ``` Length of output: 68 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --glob '*.py' -A 5 'PrepRunFp\(' ``` Length of output: 4329
dpgen2/superop/prep_run_lmp.py (1)
`55-60`: **LGTM! Verify the constructor usage in the codebase.** The changes to handle `prep_config` and `run_config` as `Optional[dict]` with `None` as a default value are approved. This approach prevents mutable default argument issues and enhances flexibility. Ensure that all instances where this constructor is called are updated to handle the `None` default appropriately. Run the following script to verify the constructor usage:
Verification successful --- **Constructor Usage Verified Successfully** The constructor for `PrepRunLmp` is used with explicit configurations for `prep_config` and `run_config` across the codebase. The change to handle `None` defaults does not impact the current usages. Future instantiations should ensure proper handling of `None` defaults if used. - Instances found in: - `tests/test_block_cl.py` - `tests/test_prep_run_lmp.py` - `tests/test_dpgen_loop.py` - `dpgen2/entrypoint/submit.py`
Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 $'PrepRunLmp(' ``` Length of output: 110 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 'PrepRunLmp\(' ``` Length of output: 69 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type py -A 5 'PrepRunLmp\(' ``` Length of output: 3317
dpgen2/superop/prep_run_diffcsp.py (1)
`56-61`: **LGTM! Verify the constructor usage in the codebase.** The changes to handle `prep_config` and `run_config` as `Optional[dict]` with `None` as a default value are approved. This approach prevents mutable default argument issues and enhances flexibility. Ensure that all instances where this constructor is called are updated to handle the `None` default appropriately. Run the following script to verify the constructor usage:
Verification successful --- **Constructor Usage Verified: No Issues Found** The constructor for `PrepRunDiffCSP` is used appropriately across the codebase, with instances showing correct handling of `None` defaults for `prep_config` and `run_config`. - **File:** `tests/test_prep_run_diffcsp.py` - **File:** `dpgen2/entrypoint/submit.py` These usages confirm that the changes to handle `Optional[dict]` with `None` as a default value are properly integrated.
Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 $'PrepRunDiffCSP(' ``` Length of output: 122 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 'PrepRunDiffCSP(' ``` Length of output: 122 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Corrected script with escaped parentheses to verify all constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --type python -A 5 'PrepRunDiffCSP\(' ``` Length of output: 73 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Adjusted script to search within Python files for constructor calls to ensure they handle the `None` default appropriately. # Test: Search for the class instantiation. Expect: Proper handling of `None` defaults. rg --glob '*.py' -A 5 'PrepRunDiffCSP\(' ``` Length of output: 1595
dpgen2/superop/prep_run_dp_train.py (2)
`63-64`: **Improved flexibility with optional parameters.** The change to make `prep_config` and `run_config` optional enhances flexibility by allowing `None` as a valid input. This is a good practice for handling optional configurations. --- `69-70`: **Ensure correct initialization of configurations.** The conditional initialization of `prep_config` and `run_config` ensures that they always have a valid dictionary structure. This is a robust approach to handle optional parameters.
dpgen2/superop/prep_run_calypso.py (2)
`61-62`: **Improved flexibility with optional parameters.** The change to make `prep_config` and `run_config` optional enhances flexibility by allowing `None` as a valid input. This is a good practice for handling optional configurations. --- `65-66`: **Ensure correct initialization of configurations.** The conditional initialization of `prep_config` and `run_config` ensures that they always have a valid dictionary structure. This is a robust approach to handle optional parameters.
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 84.08%. Comparing base (4967951) to head (710ae6b). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #253 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 84.05% 84.08% +0.02% ========================================== Files 103 103 Lines 5725 5735 +10 ========================================== + Hits 4812 4822 +10 Misses 913 913 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.