mobile devices

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi!
Is it possible to improve the viewing gallery on mobile devices?
Below preview of Android 4.0

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 14 May 2012 at 8:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please remove from public view my previously attached graphics. Thank you.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 14 May 2012 at 1:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi!
What should I change the settings to plug sigplus slideshow on Android, iPhone, 
iPad display images correctly?

Regards!

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 29 May 2012 at 5:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It seems that in version 1.5.0.156 images on the phone already loaded 
correctly. Thank you.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 26 Jun 2012 at 4:16

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Compatibility of the extension when accessed from mobile devices has been 
improved as of version 1.5.0.157. The <noscript> element, which has limited 
support on mobile devices, has been replaced in generated HTML content with a 
<div> element; permanently visible overlay navigation buttons "previous" and 
"next" have been added to the pop-up window in place of hover-only buttons; and 
browser history support has been greatly improved (i.e. the URL in the address 
bar changes to the currently shown image). Improved history support allows the 
pop-up window to capture the browser's "back" button and close an opened 
lightbox window (instead of leaving the page) when the user taps (or clicks) 
the "back" button.

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 27 Jun 2012 at 10:53

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Are you sure that version 1.5.7 works properly on mobile browsers?
I observed this situation:

In version 1.5.6 version of the mobile work very well. Install version 1.5.7 
returned reported malfunction.

Reinstalowałem version 1.5.6 again, unfortunately, did not result in a correct 
return for Action.
Joomla cache and browser every time I cleaned and repeatedly when installing.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 28 Jun 2012 at 8:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, verified with an Android phone, as mentioned in the opening comment. 
However, the template has as much say in how elements on a page appear as any 
other extension (or all the extensions put together), it would be worthwhile to 
temporarily switch to another template and see if the problem persists. The 
template might apply styling that is not reverted by explicit boxplus 
stylesheets, and an unfortunate combination of template and boxplus stylesheets 
may result in fuzzy layout. If this happens, only an explicit "reset" 
stylehsheet will help that negates the effect of the template.

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 28 Jun 2012 at 8:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Android 4.0 ? 
In 1.5.0.6 was well? why?

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 28 Jun 2012 at 9:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Tested in many ways the latest version but I still have the problem?

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 5 Jul 2012 at 4:34

Attachments:

• [sigplus err lightbox.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/sigplus/issue-31/comment-9/sigplus err lightbox.png)

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 5 Jul 2012 at 5:35

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The fact that the pop-up window used to work fine in sigplus version 1.5.0.156, 
then suddenly broke in 1.5.0.157 but not even re-installing 1.5.0.156 helped 
leads me to the conclusion that the extension, after all, has little to do with 
the issue. Please make sure no other third-party extension you might have 
installed meanwhile is interfering. In particular, your site shows a mysterious 
black box in place of (or covering part of) the main image when viewed with my 
phone, which is not to be seen with my own test sites.

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2012 at 10:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thank you for your response. I understand.
I added several links with different templates, if you want to invite you to 
test. You are right that a lot depends on the template. On this occasion, we 
can also see some other imperfections in sigplus use the mobile, I mean 
navigation and zoom option to full screen.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 10 Jul 2012 at 4:39

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Still, this error occurs. : (

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2012 at 11:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Do you have in mind this problem?

Detects system issues:
Multiple jQuery Libraries found. Please make sure these don't conflict each 
other. 
/components/com_jce/editor/libraries/js/jquery/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
/components/com_jce/editor/libraries/js/jquery/jquery-1.7.2.min.js
/components/com_jce/editor/libraries/js/jquery/jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.min.js
/components/com_jce/editor/libraries/js/jquery/jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.min.js
/components/com_jce/editor/libraries/js/jquery/jquery-ui-layout.js
/components/com_sobipro/lib/js/jquery-ui.js
/components/com_sobipro/lib/js/jquery.js
/media/com_akeeba/js/jquery-ui.js
/media/com_akeeba/js/jquery.js
/media/joomgallery/js/thickbox3/js/jquery-latest.pack.js
/media/sigplus/js/jquery.js
/media/sigplus/js/jquery.jsapi.debug.js
/media/sigplus/js/jquery.jsapi.js
/media/sigplus/js/jquery.jsapi.min.js
/media/sigplus/js/jquery.noconflict.js
/modules/mod_simplefilelisterv1.0/tmpl/jquery-1.4.3.min.js
/plugins/system/cdscriptegrator/fields/uithemecombobox/js/jquery.dd.js
/plugins/system/cdscriptegrator/libraries/cleditor/js/jquery.cleditor.min.js
/plugins/system/cdscriptegrator/libraries/jquery/js/jquery-1.7.2.min.js
/plugins/system/cdscriptegrator/libraries/jquery/js/jquery-noconflict.js
/plugins/system/cdscriptegrator/libraries/jqueryui/js/jquery-ui-1.8.20.custom.mi
n.js

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 1:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As the warning message points out, using multiple jQuery instances (especially 
of different versions) can lead to subtle errors. You must make sure only one 
jQuery instance is loaded at a time. The native lightbox, rotator and caption 
engines integrated into sigplus 1.5 (e.g. boxplus or slideplus) are based on 
MooTools, not jQuery, i.e. the said files are never included by sigplus 
assuming factory defaults: if no engine uses jQuery, sigplus does not include 
jQuery in the HTML <head>. If you use a system plug-in that loads jQuery for 
the entire site, e.g. "cdscriptegrator", it is recommended to turn off 
including jQuery for all other extensions (and the template). For sigplus, this 
is done by setting "JavaScript library source" to "none". Do this only if the 
system plug-in loading jQuery is indeed active, or all engines in sigplus that 
rely on jQuery (but not the defaults, which are based on Joomla-native 
MooTools) will be broken.

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 2:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I put on its website a number of different menus with different templates for a 
single article sigPlus gallery, you can see the difference. You are right. (to 
this page, as you know you have access).

Thanks for these tips.  I will be tested further.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 2:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Do you think only of all versions of jQuery and replacing them with one of the 
tools is a good solution?

http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/core-enhancements/performance/content-ne
tworking/16573?qh=YToxMTp7aTowO3M6NjoianF1ZXJ5IjtpOjE7czo3OiInanF1ZXJ5IjtpOjI7cz
ozMjoiJ2pxdWVyeScsJ2pxdWVyeXVpJywnanF1ZXJ5Zm9ybSciO2k6MztzOjk6IidqcXVlcnknLCI7aT
o0O3M6ODoiJ2pxdWVyeSciO2k6NTtzOjc6ImpxdWVyeSciO2k6NjtzOjY6Imdvb2dsZSI7aTo3O3M6OD
oiZ29vZ2xlJ3MiO2k6ODtzOjU6Imdvb2dsIjtpOjk7czo3OiJnb29nbGVzIjtpOjEwO3M6ODoiJ2dvb2
dsZSciO30%3D

or

http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/core-enhancements/performance/jquery-scr
ipts/12995?qh=YTo2OntpOjA7czo2OiJqcXVlcnkiO2k6MTtzOjc6IidqcXVlcnkiO2k6MjtzOjMyOi
InanF1ZXJ5JywnanF1ZXJ5dWknLCdqcXVlcnlmb3JtJyI7aTozO3M6OToiJ2pxdWVyeScsIjtpOjQ7cz
o4OiInanF1ZXJ5JyI7aTo1O3M6NzoianF1ZXJ5JyI7fQ%3D%3D

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 3:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/site-management/content-networking/6981

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 3:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes. To the best of my knowledge, jQuery is backwards compatible. Choosing the 
version with the highest version number and preventing extensions from loading 
their own version is a good precautionary strategy against a number of strange 
compatibility errors that may otherwise be extremely difficult to track down.

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 6:37

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thank you for your reply. 'll Let you know in this thread how I missed your 
problem.

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2012 at 6:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Unfortunately. Rockettehme still trying to respond to this problem and no 
solution.

The solution I have found indirect, ie, turned on the style in sigplus Lightbox 
MilkBox, also works on mobile devices.

However, it is not as functional as the one of the thumbnails, and has one 
major flaw, the devices can not touch touch the left or right edge of the 
displayed image to switch between images.

The world is now mocnno niedostoswany mobile interface for touch is a problem.

Regards!

Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2012 at 10:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Does this issue persist as of sigplus version 1.5.0.191?

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2013 at 11:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I see no problem in the current version. As you wrote probably is a big wine 
template Joomla.

Original comment by venapr...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2013 at 12:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

But pay attention to ergonomics on mobile devices.
Small clustered next to each icon size keys and 1:1 in the upper corner.
According to me to be beside the Left Right, turn off at a suitable distance 
from each other to support the finger does not cause other than the need to 
press the key.

Original comment by venapr...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2013 at 12:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Ergonomics on mobile devices is already open as a separate issue #48 called 
"Navigation on mobile devices". The question is whether the original issue here 
is still applicable. (Remember, one issue covers one well-defined topic.)

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2013 at 12:13

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by huny...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2013 at 12:16

• Changed state: Fixed