Open xiaobiaodu opened 10 months ago
It appears that stable zero123 eliminates the delta radius conditioning and opts for an estimated elevation instead. I didn't find a source that explains the reason for this.
@echosum Hello, sorry to bother you. May I ask you a question, please? I wonder that, if I want to run the code with Zero123-XL instead of Stable-Zero123, should I switch guidance_3d_type from "stable-zero123-guidance" to "zero123-guidance"?
@echosum Hello, sorry to bother you. May I ask you a question, please? I wonder that, if I want to run the code with Zero123-XL instead of Stable-Zero123, should I switch _guidance_3dtype from "stable-zero123-guidance" to "zero123-guidance"?
I think you should use "zero123-unified-guidance"
@flyingdoubleG Hello, many thanks to your guidance! I wonder whether there are non-trivial difference between zero123-guidance and zero123-unified-guidance? Because I have run some cases with zero123-guidance and zero123-xl.ckpt and the geometries of the results are reasonable.
Thanks a lot! :)
@flyingdoubleG Hello, many thanks to your guidance! I wonder whether there are non-trivial difference between zero123-guidance and zero123-unified-guidance? Because I have run some cases with zero123-guidance and zero123-xl.ckpt and the geometries of the results are reasonable.
Thanks a lot! :)
Ah, I think they are almost same except the way for loading the model, and zero123-unified-guidance also implemented VSD, you can try both
@flyingdoubleG Thank you for your answer! I will try both of them.
@flyingdoubleG Hi! Can you help to find where I can set zero123-guidance and zero123-unified-guidance? I can't find these settings(
Hi
Thanks for your excellent work.
I am wondering the slight difference in your stable_zero123_guidance.py and zero123_guidence.py. Could you please explain why the delta radius is different from zero123?