Closed beckynevin closed 3 months ago
for modularity, should these each be their own function (parity diff, parity difference covariance, parity), or should they inherit(wc?) from each other?
Parity plots = 1-1 plots = p-p plots = true vs. predicted plots
parity difference plot = true - predicted vs. true (y-axis vs x-axis)
variants include residual: (true - predicted / true) vs. true percentage: (true - predicted / true)*100 vs. true
often the parity difference plot goes directly underneath the parity plot and share their x-axes.
The parity difference covariance plot is a corner plot, where they independent and dependent variables are the difference between true and expected. JasonPoh came up with this, and has examples in his strong lensing repository.
Here are some examples of parity plots
these are residuals like what's in the lower panel of the above comment. 1_param_corner_42.pdf
This is an example of a parity difference plot 5param_corner_465.pdf
Any strong feelings on this? The difference, residuals, and percentage plots are all optional.
I like this. I also envision a few variations. But, I think we can go with this as the baseline, and then we can make some updates later. Does that sound right?
This could be expanded to parity difference and parity difference covariance plots.