Closed StephenRicher closed 3 years ago
Hi Stephen,
you can use the older 3.4 version where these arguments were not required. I would be interested to know if that works and if yes, we could discuss ways to integrate Micro-C into the current version.
Best,
Joachim
Hi Joachim,
Thanks for your quick response. Brilliant thanks I will try that and let you know how it goes.
Thanks, Stephen
Hi @StephenRicher , would you mind giving us an update about your experince in using hicexplorer on micro-c data?
Hi @LeilyR, sorry I have not had a chance to get back to you on this. I have been a bit side tracked lately, but i still intend to try this and will let you know. If you did want to close the issue I would be happy to just re-raise it as a suggestion later, but I don't mind either way :)
I tried my MicroC sample with 3.4.0 without providing enzyme data for QC purposes. And the result seems reasonable.
Hi,
Thank you for developing this fantastic tool, I have been using it extensively for my Hi-C analysis. I have some Micro-C data and was wondering if I could use your tool to process this?
Since Micro-C is not restriction fragment based I imagine the key difference between Hi-C will be in the build matrix step. I would like to ignore the restriction sequence based arguments. Is there a way to do this as these argument are now required arguments for hicBuildMatrix.
Thanks very much, Stephen