Open AdamantConlanger opened 3 years ago
I like this idea. It might be tricky to implement, since it doesn't actually work the same way as a normal filter; it would be a totally different feature that just happens to share the same syntax.
Note that all sounds within a syllable are considered to have that syllable's features, so you should just be able to write
iterative-progressive-stress-assignment propagate:
<syl> => [+stress] / [+stress] <syl> _
This is a request for an enhancement.
let's say we have
then Lexurgy gives the error
I understand that "filter by syllable" doesn't actually make sense, because everything's part of a syllable. But it would be useful for readability if you were able to have
[+stress]
refer to a syllable instead of a phoneme. Yes, this is already possible by writingbut writing
<syl>&[+feature]
is way more clunky than being able to just have a<syl>
filter and writing[+feature]
so might this be an option for future implementation?