search

defenseunicorns / uds-package-software-factory

Replaced by https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-software-factory
Apache License 2.0
8 stars 2 forks source link

Initial contributors guide #24

Closed mikevanhemert closed 1 year ago

mikevanhemert commented 1 year ago

I used inspiration from Zarf and the internet to create this initial Contributors guide.

oates commented 1 year ago

🙌🏼

zachariahmiller commented 1 year ago

@mikevanhemert This is great and its good to have a contributing guide at the repo level, but i think we need to apply this across all UDS packages and capabilities. I have made a wiki page as an interim solution to link to in the DoD section across all tickets coming down the pipe, with the intent that it will all be captured as a UDS level ADR, which can be referenced in the future.

anthonywendt commented 1 year ago

@mikevanhemert This is great and its good to have a contributing guide at the repo level, but i think we need to apply this across all UDS packages and capabilities. I have made a wiki page as an interim solution to link to in the DoD section across all tickets coming down the pipe, with the intent that it will all be captured as a UDS level ADR, which can be referenced in the future.

So is it okay to merge this in as is? Do we need to link to that wiki and add a note about a WIP ADR related to definition of done? @zachariahmiller @mikevanhemert

zachariahmiller commented 1 year ago

@mikevanhemert This is great and its good to have a contributing guide at the repo level, but i think we need to apply this across all UDS packages and capabilities. I have made a wiki page as an interim solution to link to in the DoD section across all tickets coming down the pipe, with the intent that it will all be captured as a UDS level ADR, which can be referenced in the future.

So is it okay to merge this in as is? Do we need to link to that wiki and add a note about a WIP ADR related to definition of done? @zachariahmiller @mikevanhemert

@anthonywendt I dont feel strongly either way about the path forward. I had made that wiki page to reference in the issues as i was trying to organize them. I dont think that or the potential ADR should be a reason to not merge this PR.