Closed zachariahmiller closed 7 months ago
@zachariahmiller Is this just renaming the text from upstream-ce
to upstream
?
@naveensrinivasan My understanding is yes. It would be renaming the flavor to remove the -ce and updating the places it is passed into the UDS tasks/from the GitHub workflows.
I was hoping someone might be able to confirm that there was no other reason since Mike left. I don't think there was. As far as I'm concerned, make the changes, if ci passed drop a quick message in swf slack channel as an FYI of the rename and then we can merge it in.
Anyone using this in a prod environment would be using the registry1 flavor so there is minimal to no risk of impacting anyone on delivery.
@naveensrinivasan My understanding is yes. It would be renaming the flavor to remove the -ce and updating the places it is passed into the UDS tasks/from the GitHub workflows.
I was hoping someone might be able to confirm that there was no other reason since Mike left. I don't think there was. As far as I'm concerned, make the changes, if ci passed drop a quick message in swf slack channel as an FYI of the rename and then we can merge it in.
Anyone using this in a prod environment would be using the registry1 flavor so there is minimal to no risk of impacting anyone on delivery.
Thank you!!
Describe what should be investigated or refactored
align flavor naming (change
upstream-ce
toupstream
)Additional context
Was there a reason -ce was added other than that Mike had originally implemented gitlab that way?