deliciousmods / 1956_reboot

Road to 56 Reboot
1 stars 2 forks source link

States Wishlist #20

Open SpicyAlfredo opened 6 years ago

SpicyAlfredo commented 6 years ago

Since we're starting from the ground up we have the freedom to add new states if we please.

SpicyAlfredo commented 6 years ago

My wish-list:

-USA

West Virginia (Most likely will be added to game in "Man the Guns" but maintaining our own has benefits) Reason: Let's us have C.S.A and Union borders. Civil war anyone?

I'm against dividing up New England into it's individual states. And adding Delaware. Cause there's not a good enough reason imo to do so.

Texas could be divide in two. It's a more accurate reflection of Mexican claims but this is not a necessity

-Africa

Central Africa needs to be divide up into smaller pieces. Based on decolonization borders as much as possible.

-China

Some states need to be divide up to better reflect Tibet's claims in the region better.

Some Northern states can be divide up to better reflect who had control of what. But pre-war china's politics are a mess and I'm no expert. So we should only divide these states up if we should have plans to add more warlords etc. Which I'm personally against.

-Mongolia

Should probably be divide into two or three.

-South America

The amazon should be divide in relation of Peru's, Columbia claims into the region. Also I don't like a mega state like that. Though we should try to split it into two only.

-Denmark

Greenland should be divide into two. The usable coast line and it's ice sheet interior. (Impassable maybe?)

Greatexperiment commented 6 years ago

I agree, we should be very careful about this. There needs to be a very solid gameplay reason to add a state.

The gold standard for adding a state should be - there's something we really want to do that we can't do right now without altering the map. A great example of that would be the division of Berlin in the Cold War. It makes a lot of sense to make a new area to accurately show that and deal with the practical effects. I don't know that this particular example works well in our case (dividing it would be weird for WWII play) - but hopefully it illustrates the level of justification needed.

Dividing for the sake of dividing or just generally breaking up overly large provinces isn't a good enough reason. Regardless, this isn't something we're going to do for a very long time. There's lots of time to debate it.

I admit that I am somewhat biased in favor of a more elegant map, rather than tons of provinces. It's one of the reasons I didn't get into HOI III - their map was basically porn for the hardcore segment, but a completely disaster of design, and definitely drove the message home - more is not always better.

SpicyAlfredo commented 6 years ago

I'm my nudge experiments I divide up French Africa into it's nation states. Since I think PDX wanted to that judging by the provinces but never did.

Greatexperiment commented 6 years ago

Africa is probably too simple to accommodate our plans to have more nations there. I'd say it makes sense to give them enough provinces to be functional and competitive.

SpicyAlfredo commented 6 years ago

capturedsd Here's what I've done with French Africa the other day.

Lyylik51 commented 6 years ago

What I would like to see:

Greatexperiment commented 6 years ago

Something to keep in mind is that PDX will probably add more states in Man the Guns - and the way the current system works means that it will royally screw with everyone else that adds them. In an ideal world we could just assign custom numbers to each one so the chance of conflict is minimal, but everything needs to be in order. :(

Llutozz commented 6 years ago

After the most recent dev diary - I personally think Africa and China are the two regions to focus on for new states or provinces if at all. Some more impassable zones (especially in Siberia imo) could be nice.