Closed tomykho closed 7 years ago
Thanks for your feedback!
Is there any specific reason why this change should be implemented? Or is it just a personal preference?
Yes, because APK grew bigger when using Jackson.
Thanks for explaining the motivation.
We might save up to 776.9 KB (uncompressed) if GSON was indeed a full replacement for everything that we currently use Jackson for. But since the binary size is not the only consideration, the space saved is not really that much (compressed even less) and replacing the implementation takes effort that might be more useful in other places, we won't do this for now. Sorry!
Is it possible to use GSON instead of Jackson?