Closed goodmami closed 3 years ago
Item 291 in the mrs test suite gives the following bad MRS in the 2018 version and trunk:
mrs
[ "Abrams wondered which dog barked." TOP: h0 INDEX: e2 [ e SF: prop TENSE: past MOOD: indicative PROG: - PERF: - ] RELS: < [ proper_q<0:6> LBL: h4 ARG0: x3 [ x PERS: 3 NUM: sg IND: + ] RSTR: h5 BODY: h6 ] [ named<0:6> LBL: h7 ARG0: x3 CARG: "Abrams" ] [ relative_mod<7:33> LBL: h1 ARG0: i9 ARG1: x10 [ x PERS: 3 NUM: sg IND: + ] ARG2: h11 ] [ udef_q<7:33> LBL: h12 ARG0: x10 RSTR: h13 BODY: h14 ] [ generic_entity<7:33> LBL: h15 ARG0: x10 ] [ _wonder_v_1<7:15> LBL: h1 ARG0: e2 ARG1: x3 ] [ _which_q<16:21> LBL: h16 ARG0: x10 RSTR: h17 BODY: h18 ] [ _dog_n_1<22:25> LBL: h19 ARG0: x10 ] [ _bark_v_1<26:33> LBL: h11 ARG0: e20 [ e SF: prop TENSE: past MOOD: indicative PROG: - PERF: - ] ARG1: x10 ] > HCONS: < h0 qeq h1 h5 qeq h7 h13 qeq h15 h17 qeq h19 > ]
Note that udef_q, generic_entity, _which_q, and _dog_n_1 all share the ARG0 of x10.
udef_q
generic_entity
_which_q
_dog_n_1
ARG0
x10
This analysis is not present in the 1214 version, so it appears to be a regression.
The bad MRS came from an unwanted parse, which the ERG now excludes.
Item 291 in the
mrs
test suite gives the following bad MRS in the 2018 version and trunk:Note that
udef_q
,generic_entity
,_which_q
, and_dog_n_1
all share theARG0
ofx10
.This analysis is not present in the 1214 version, so it appears to be a regression.