Open emilymbender opened 2 years ago
A set up like this leads to many types with repeated constraints that should ideally be pulled up onto a supertype:
section=adnom-poss poss-pron1_type=affix poss-pron1_agr=non-agree poss-pron1_mod-spec=spec section=morphology noun-pc1_name=poss_inal_non1 noun-pc1_obligatory=on noun-pc1_order=suffix noun-pc1_inputs=noun109, noun110 noun-pc1_lrt1_name=poss_inalienable_2sg noun-pc1_lrt1_feat1_name=poss-pron1 noun-pc1_lrt1_feat1_value=plus noun-pc1_lrt1_feat1_head=itself noun-pc1_lrt1_feat2_name=pernum noun-pc1_lrt1_feat2_value=2sg noun-pc1_lrt1_feat2_head=possessor noun-pc1_lrt1_lri1_inflecting=yes noun-pc1_lrt1_lri1_orth=-m noun-pc1_lrt2_name=poss_inalienable_3sg noun-pc1_lrt2_feat1_name=poss-pron1 noun-pc1_lrt2_feat1_value=plus noun-pc1_lrt2_feat1_head=itself noun-pc1_lrt2_feat2_name=pernum noun-pc1_lrt2_feat2_value=3sg noun-pc1_lrt2_feat2_head=possessor noun-pc1_lrt2_lri1_inflecting=yes noun-pc1_lrt2_lri1_orth=-n
A set up like this leads to many types with repeated constraints that should ideally be pulled up onto a supertype: