I had a grammar in 567 this quarter (hix) where object wh questions weren’t parsing because ex-comp said [ SUBJ < > ] but head-subj said [ COMPS < > ]. Test whether this is what comes out of the customization system & if so, fix. Fast fix for the grammar in class was [ SUBJ cons ] on ex-comp, but this possibly doesn’t generalize to other kinds of complement extraction.
Combination to test: Does OVS order get along with:
section=wh-q front-matrix=single matrix-front-opt=single-oblig
I had a grammar in 567 this quarter (hix) where object wh questions weren’t parsing because ex-comp said [ SUBJ < > ] but head-subj said [ COMPS < > ]. Test whether this is what comes out of the customization system & if so, fix. Fast fix for the grammar in class was [ SUBJ cons ] on ex-comp, but this possibly doesn’t generalize to other kinds of complement extraction.