Extra copy of adj-head-int

[emilymbender]

The attached choices file leads to a grammar with two separate instantiations of adj-head-int-phrase (one called adj-head and one called adj-head-int). This obviously leads to undesirable ambiguity. hadj-int-choices.txt

[ajcassell]

@emilymbender is adj-head-int different from adj-head? Does it suffice to change the instantiation to say adj-head-int := instead of adj-head := or do they represent different things? I tried that and all the regression tests passed.

[emilymbender]

The adj-head rules that are instantiated should all inherit from either the "intersective" or "scopal" types. I don't know if that grammar had something that was inheriting from an underspecified supertype, or actually just had effectively two copies of the same rule.

[ajcassell]

The rules were both inheriting from the same adj-head-int-phrase supertype nothing else, so I believe that makes them just duplicates.

[emilymbender]

Ok! Then we just want one and it should be called adj-head-int.