Closed ajcassell closed 3 weeks ago
Testing this before making changes... negative adverb named same as lexicon adverb results in
testneg := testneg-adverb-lex & neg-adv-lex & [ STEM < "testneg" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "_testneg_a_rel" & "neg_rel" ].
whereas two differently named ones results in
testneg2 := testneg2-adverb-lex & [ STEM < "testneg2" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "_testneg2_a_rel" ].
testneg := neg-adv-lex & [ STEM < "testneg" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "neg_rel" ].
in the lexicon.
Now, there is validation on both pages that prevents this.
363
Testing this before making changes... negative adverb named same as lexicon adverb results in
testneg := testneg-adverb-lex & neg-adv-lex & [ STEM < "testneg" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "_testneg_a_rel" & "neg_rel" ].
whereas two differently named ones results in
testneg2 := testneg2-adverb-lex & [ STEM < "testneg2" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "_testneg2_a_rel" ].
testneg := neg-adv-lex & [ STEM < "testneg" >, SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "neg_rel" ].
in the lexicon.
Now, there is validation on both pages that prevents this.