Closed ajcassell closed 1 week ago
This looks like it's taking care of half of #564.
This looks like it's taking care of half of #564.
Which part is missing?
The part about MOD.
The MOD <> already exists on the mother. If I interpreted our slack thread correctly, isn't the MOD specified there on line 126? If you are referring to the poss-unary-pron phrase, I did not add the MOD because the issue only mentioned COORD - for that rule. I can add it there as well if needed though.
"poss-unary-phrase has a similar issue, where it should say [ COORD - ] on the daughter and [ MOD < > ] on the mother."
This is the poss-unary-phrase, right?
I assume so -- and it looks like it is there. So let's call it good.
564