Closed goodmami closed 6 years ago
yes - there's a link in the paper to a wiki page which has hardly anything on it ... I will try and instantiate it further over the next few days.
Ann
On 25/05/2016 17:26, Michael Wayne Goodman wrote:
Just a documentation bug.
The README says Copestake 2007, but it's actually 2009.
Also, if you put bullets before the citations, they will appear as a list:
Alternatively, a blank newline between them will present them on separate lines.
(and if editing the README, maybe add some more info, like installation instructions, basic usage, requirements, etc. There should be some basic info for people coming to get the new release (e.g. from LREC), although I now notice the Copestake et al. (2016) paper doesn't have a link to pydmrs)
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/delph-in/pydmrs/issues/20
Thanks, Mike. I'll update the README soon!
Just a documentation bug.
The README says Copestake 2007, but it's actually 2009.
Also, if you put bullets before the citations, they will appear as a list:
Alternatively, a blank newline between them will present them on separate lines.
(and if editing the README, maybe add some more info, like installation instructions, basic usage, requirements, etc. There should be some basic info for people coming to get the new release (e.g. from LREC), although I now notice the Copestake et al. (2016) paper doesn't have a link to pydmrs)