Ordinal number lexical entries not showing up in some parse forests

olzama commented 1 year ago

E.g. item 3800 it tbdb18, for primera

olzama commented 6 months ago

In example 4319 from tbdb05:

4319@unknown@formal@none@1@S@En tercera posición aparece Portugal.@(1, 0, 1, <0:2>, 1, "en" "en", 0, "sp", "sp" 1.00000000) (2, 1, 2, <3:10>, 1, "z" "tercera", 0, "z", "z" -1.00000000) (3, 2, 3, <11:19>, 1, "posición" "posición", 0, "ncfs000", "ncfs000" 1.00000000) (4, 3, 4, <20:27>, 1, "aparecer" "aparece", 0, "vmip3s0", "vmip3s0" 0.99479167) (5, 4, 5, <28:36>, 1, "portugal" "portugal", 0, "np00g00", "np00g00" 1.00000000) (6, 5, 6, <36:37>, 1, "." ".", 0, "fp", "fp" 1.00000000)@@@1@5@@montse@25-apr-2010

the word tercera ends up being analyzed not as an ordinal number but as an adjective that is for some reason plural. I don't understand why that is and how that is connected to the z tag.

olzama commented 6 months ago

The issue with item 4319 is that it gets a cardinal number analysis (incorrectly) but furthermore, the cardinal number is for some reason constrained to be 3pl?

d_-_q-nu-card_lex := det_quant_eval &
  [ SYNSEM [ LOCAL [ AGR.PNG.PN 3pl,
                     CAT.VAL.SPR < > ],
             LKEYS.ALTKEYREL.PRED card_q_rel ] ]
  """
  a)- determiners / indef. adjectives (Z)
  !!! num + sust pueden formar una unidad inseparable, e.g. esas tristes dos pesetas,
  esas famosas tres tardes con Teresa
  e.g. (los) tres hermanos
  """.

olzama commented 5 months ago

This should be fixed in commit ab40a9c

delph-in / srg

Ordinal number lexical entries not showing up in some parse forests #63