Closed bartvanheukelom closed 9 years ago
Feel free to implement it, I see no issue with it since it'd not introduce any real overhead.
I would, but I don't know Caxe, only Haxe.
It's just an extension of haxe, the changes should be small enough that you wouldn't even have to compile anything ;)
It would be convenient if we could give new instances of CbType a name in the constructor, which is then returned as part of its toString(). This is easier to debug than "CbType#123"