codecov[bot]
commented
1 week ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 81.11%. Comparing base (
e8cd96c) to head (02b8909).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1569 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 81.32% 81.11% -0.22% ========================================== Files 98 98 Lines 7100 7100 ========================================== - Hits 5774 5759 -15 - Misses 1326 1341 +15 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/delvtech/agent0/pull/1569/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=delvtech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/delvtech/agent0/pull/1569/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=delvtech) | `81.11% <100.00%> (-0.22%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=delvtech#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
calc_max_*errors from to WARNING instead of ERRORThere are still errors being logged as ERROR that we expect, e.g.,
InsufficientLiquidityorCircuitBreakerTriggeredon a contract call. Need follow up PR to handle these, or log as less severe.