share adjustment (zeta) was using a non-inclusive range, but the requirement (<=) implies inclusive should be valid.
I tested this with the bounds (share_adjustment = 0 and share_adjustment = share_reserves - min_share_reserves - fixed!(10e18)) and all tests passed with both extremes
note that I had to reduce the upper-bound by fixed!(10e18) for the tests to pass, which I guess means we were just getting lucky before. I made an issue for this: https://github.com/delvtech/hyperdrive-rs/issues/171
dynamic fuzz is supposed to do 10x fuzz runs on new tests, but was 1x with FAST_FUZZ_RUNS
fix a check in an open.rs test where the allowable max bond amount was too low
Description
<=) implies inclusive should be valid.share_adjustment = 0andshare_adjustment = share_reserves - min_share_reserves - fixed!(10e18)) and all tests passed with both extremesfixed!(10e18)for the tests to pass, which I guess means we were just getting lucky before. I made an issue for this: https://github.com/delvtech/hyperdrive-rs/issues/171FAST_FUZZ_RUNSopen.rstest where the allowable max bond amount was too low