Open futuroptimist opened 1 year ago
This is a proposal to add item locks as a new primary feature of processes. This means to ensure backwards compatibility it must be optional.
Add a new field to the json object called locksItems, which is a list of
locksItems
Now that I think about it, there may be no use case for requiresItem that doesn't lock the item. I could be wrong.
This is a proposal to add item locks as a new primary feature of processes. This means to ensure backwards compatibility it must be optional.
Add a new field to the json object called
locksItems
, which is a list of