Open denar90 opened 6 years ago
Expected options:
Doesn't that complicate things further? As the readme states, if a user is willing to open the devtools and choose whatever options they like, what is the need for sloth anyway?
And the answer sums it up. It is for lazy people who do not want to open DevTools and click through all the hurdles just to be able to enable throttling.
If you were to add those options here, then it might reduce one step compared to the DevTools route but it totally beats the purpose of the extension.
Yes you re right. But we store user selection in a profile, so it will be almost one time move. Motivation behind this - throttling used in Sloth might be to rough for users with too slow working machines. So they can select what better for them to have: throttling and proper level slowness to have deal with browsing the site.
During wring the reply I realized that developer can make it faster (4G desktop) and suppose it's good and forget about slow devices.
@abhisheksoni27 thanks, I agree, let's keep as is. In case options are needed we can reconsider adding them.
Expected options:
- fast mobile (includes CPU and 4G network throttling)
- slow mobile (includes CPU and 3G network throttling)
- fast desktop (4G network throttling)
- slow desktop (3G network throttling)
No need for these but an option for adding custom download, upload, and latency would be great !!!
Since we have settings window in new design
there might be place for that.
Also will be nice to stick to Lighthouse approach, like that one
Is it something interesting you'd like to work on @Suleman-Elahi ?
I'd love to but I never tried my hands on JS or Chrome Extensions :[]
I can assist in case you'd like to try :)
As a user, I want to have dropdown to choose/type throttling values