Thanks for your valuable work. However, I have several questions about your work:
Why did you choose the original SAM from facebook instead of other variants? As far as I know, there are two SAMs (MedSAM and SAM-Med2D) that are trained on large-scale medical image datasets instead of natural image datasets. Even more, there is also a light-weighted SAM model (LiteMedSAM).
Have you compared the segmentation performance of the above models?
I found that the SAM cannot inference images by batch, how did you solve this problem? (Iterating images one by one?)
Anyway, thank you for open sourcing this novel work.
Initially, we chose to use SAMUS for reasons of computing resources, and LiteMedSAM seems to be the later. Moreover, SAMUS is better suited to our task(Echocardiography Segmentation).
Thanks for your valuable work. However, I have several questions about your work:
Anyway, thank you for open sourcing this novel work.