We had several applications which would have been ranked highly except
that they were blocked by something else. (A higher-ranking
application from the same student; a better application for the same
project; a conflict where we agreed to give up the student.)
It would be nice if we could say "This app is blocked by that one".
From that point on, the blocked app would not show in our normal
summary. (Perhaps a third tab, like ineligible.) But the blocking app
will show something (not nec in the summary), and if it is later
rejected, the blocked app should come back, with a notice to anyone who
since commented on the blocking app.
Example:
Student 1 proposes project A.
Student 2 also proposed project A, but isn't as qualified.
Mark Student 1 as blocking Student 2.
Student 2 no longer shows up in our ranking counts.
Student 1 gets accepted at some other org.
We can say "go ahead and have her".
Student 1 is then marked as blocked by OtherOrgApp. If they turn out
to have fewer slots than they expected, then (since we didn't change
the scores) Student 1 still has a chance with us.
Student 2 then re-enters our ranking list.
People who commented on Student 1 are notified, in case they were
voting for the project regardless of student, and want to mod up
Student 2.
===========================
We had several applications that would have gotten slots if they hadn't
been accepted elsewhere. Or, at least we *think* they were accepted
elsewhere. So we marked them way down to get them off our list; when
the other org changed their minds ... in at least one case, we found
out and marked the student back up manually.
We had several students with multiple applications, and almost
conflicted with ourselves.
We had several students with very similar proposals. When the selected
student got accepted elsewhere, we would have liked to take the second
choice -- but we didn't want both, so we couldn't just give them
similar scores.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by JimJJew...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2007 at 3:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
JimJJew...@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2007 at 3:34