search

denoland / wanted_modules

Is there a missing deno module that is preventing you from building something? Let us know here.
https://deno.land/x
46 stars 2 forks source link

[Support] Swap the repo behind x/docxml #94

Closed wvbe closed 4 months ago

wvbe commented 4 months ago

Hey there!

TLDR; I am the original author of wvbe/docxml. Soon I'll be leaving my current employer, and they will be taking over on its development -- but as a fork, ie. the origin changes username. I am looking for someone to change which repository may publish to deno.land/x/docxml, or guidance on how to do so myself.

I see no way to transfer which repository may push to the webhook for publishing to deno.land/x/docxml. Because there are no authentication keys involved I presume that deno.land remembers which GH repository pushed originally, and allows only that repo to push. I could not find other information about this on deno.land, but the following FAQ item makes me think it is reasonable to ask for support from Deno:

A module is name-squatting or its just made as a joke, can I have it? Name squatting is not allowed on the deno.land/x/. If you feel that a module is not currently usable, has not been legitimately under development for more than 90 days, and you have a concrete proposal to publish a well-maintained module in its place, please contact support.

Since there is not an email that I could find anywhere, I decided to try my luck through this GitHub issue. I believe Fonto meets the criteria of maintaining the module and "legitimately" developing it, whereas my source for it will be updated only on a hobby basis at best.

Thank you for any help or guidance you can give me!

wvbe commented 4 months ago

I've discovered support@deno.land and sent them an email with the above request. Pending their response I'll update (close?) this ticket :)

wvbe commented 4 months ago

This issue was resolved, within minutes, by the excellent @crowlKats. Thank you! Now closing issue.