Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I tested all 8 Reverberation analysers using RIR1.wav, a 6-second long audio
file provided in the Audio folder and all but Blind_RT_LoellmannJeub2012.m seem
to be working fine. The error I got when using the one that caused an issue is:
Error using ML_RT_estimation (line 121)
remove_from_avg(1) larger than given speech signal
Error in Blind_RT_LoellmannJeub2012 (line 82)
[rt_est,rt_est_mean,rt_est_dbg] = ML_RT_estimation(audio(:,1,1)',simpar);
Error in aarae>analyze_btn_Callback (line 792)
feval(handles.funname,audiodata);
Error in gui_mainfcn (line 96)
feval(varargin{:});
Error in aarae (line 43)
gui_mainfcn(gui_State, varargin{:});
Error in
@(hObject,eventdata)aarae('analyze_btn_Callback',hObject,eventdata,guidata(hObje
ct))
Error using waitfor
Error while evaluating uicontrol Callback
Original comment by danielj...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2014 at 11:45
the blind reverb time estimator needs about 60 s of speech - so it may return
an error if you send it unexpected data (like a room impulse response).
Not sure what ttfufj's problem is, though - they are working at my end no
problem.
Original comment by densil.c...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2014 at 12:17
By the way, there should only be 5 reverberation time analysers now (some older
ones were incorporated into a new more versatile one). we need to work out how
to reliably delete functions from aarae.
Original comment by densil.c...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2014 at 12:26
I kept getting errors (even using 'RIR1.wav') till I downloaded the latest
version just now. No errors anymore..
Mind you, the error prone version that i had was only a couple of days old and
i'd been able to use the reverbtime calculators in the AAA class. That's why i
was wondering if there was work being done on these processors. Not sure why i
was getting errors if the processors are the same (I'm assuming) as the version
that i had downloaded last wednesday and then on this Monday. Anyhow, it works
now.
Original comment by ttftufj
on 18 Mar 2014 at 8:09
Btw, i still see 8 processors in the latest version of AARAE (downloaded at
0658 today). Are there meant to be 5 now, or was densil.cabrera suggesting
danieljimo to delete the redundant ones....
Original comment by ttftufj
on 18 Mar 2014 at 8:14
I wouldn't be sure which ones are the ones to be deleted. I believe in order
for deleted files to effectively be removed from the repository you have to
verify that the boxes are checked when you commit to changes.
Original comment by danielj...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2014 at 11:31
We have tried to clean this up - hopefully a download from repository head will
not include the redundant deleted files now...
Original comment by densil.c...@gmail.com
on 20 Mar 2014 at 1:35
Original comment by danielj...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2014 at 4:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ttftufj
on 18 Mar 2014 at 2:47