Closed mackhowell-nava closed 4 months ago
The issue that they are investigating deals with duplicate EP130s being established after filing dependency claims whereas the EP Merge app specifically deals with submission of the 526 EZ form for disability compensation.
Currently when a 686c and/or 674 are submitted from va.gov, each one of those forms is creating a separate EP130, resulting in tiered incremented 130s (130,131,132,133)
Some more details about those forms and their end products:
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 686c, officially known as "Declaration of Status of Dependents," is used by veterans to report any changes in the status of their dependents. This form is essential for updating the VA on matters such as:
By keeping the VA informed of these changes, veterans ensure that their benefits are adjusted accurately according to their current dependency status. This can affect the amount of compensation or pension benefits they receive.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 674, known as the "Request for Approval of School Attendance," is used by veterans or their dependents to request approval for educational benefits for a child between the ages of 18 and 23 who is attending school. This form helps the VA determine the eligibility of the dependent for continued benefits based on their school attendance.
Key uses of VA Form 674 include:
Filing this form ensures that the dependent child continues to receive benefits during their educational period, as long as they meet the VA's requirements for school attendance.
An End Product (EP) 130 in the Department of Veterans Affairs system is typically associated with actions related to dependency claims. Here are the forms that might generate an EP130:
VA Form 21-686c: Declaration of Status of Dependents
VA Form 21-674: Request for Approval of School Attendance
VA Form 21-674b: School Attendance Report
VA Form 21-509: Statement of Dependency of Parent(s)
These forms are utilized to update the VA on the status of a veteran's dependents, which can affect the benefits they receive. Submitting any of these forms typically results in the generation of an EP130 to process the changes or requests.
These are the two potential paths forward:
- if we establish a single 130, the system could append the contentions to the existing EP (preferred, optimal for field user experience)
- If not, create the subsequent claim as an EP400 series as opposed to an incremented 130.
We could potentially leverage our existing application/infrastructure to perform the merging of successive EP130s when there is already an existing pending EP. We would need to verify several things first:
@dfitchett - Have you reached out to Daniel Bennett to see the research cited in the other ticket to understand the errors he is referring to?
Nevermind!! I've got it and will share with you via your va.gov email account.
Open questions:
See this ticket for more context: https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/digital-experience-products/issues/973
Acceptance Criteria