Closed gnakm closed 7 years ago
Can we get the FAQ in for Milestone 2? What will be the requirement for entering ID?
Previous AC:
Currently (for the pilot) users have to type in the Veteran ID number in the URL in order to access Reader. This is prone to error and quite frankly, annoying. Let's give them a better experience!
Operation let's get rid of URL hack!
@mdbenjam Could we show users what cases they've already opened vs. new ones that came in? Trying to understand the level of complexity this may entail.
@gnakm I think that's doable. We'd have to create new DB entries, but that could lead to some interesting data so I think it's worth doing.
Two notes.
@mdbenjam Sounds good.
Dropping this here for future:
@gnakm i can't capitalize Attorney/Judge. it hurts my soul too much. This means the mock copy is slightly different from the copy description -- i added a note.
also, I can take point on updating FAQs with @wturne. 😄
@mdbenjam to what extent does including the search functionality here increase the scope of this ticket (is it something we can reuse from another application?)? i'm wondering if we should break it out as its own ticket or if you think it makes sense to develop all of this at once. (given interaction, potential errors, etc.)
@abbyraskin I vote that we make a separate issue for the top as well. I beefed up the AC for the search part at the top.
@mdbenjam Also, could you tell me some use cases of errors for searching ID number? The :tumbler_glass: Check list told me to check in with you about this 😛
For the copy, you might be better off going with "claims folder" rather than "case file". That is the language people use, anyway. But I defer to all of you wise folks.
Thanks, let's go with that if @gnakm is okay with it! (I think I've had "c-file" engrained in me since my very formative eFolder Express days.)
It looks like the AC could use a little updating in general, as we removed some of the columns. I will tidy it up and post the old AC here. (note there will be small copy changes that differ from mocks @mdbenjam)
(Old AC for reference)
This is operation, "Let's get rid of URL hack!" Currently users have to type in the Veteran ID number in the URL in order to access Reader. Let's give them a better experience!
h1
from styleguideprimary
button with word "New"NOTE - copy below is more accurate than copy in the mock!
Title: Welcome to Reader!
Body: Reader allows attorneys and judges to review and annotate Veteran case files. Search for a Veteran ID below to get started.
Learn more about Reader on our FAQ page.
Search story tracked in https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/issues/2342
@mdbenjam Sorry for getting back to you late on the button width. I added this to the AC above - Width of "new" button should match "continue" button. Basically the padding on the button is correct according to style guide but I'm going to add when buttons are STACKED, they should all be same width. It's an exception we're going to have to add.
reader/appeal
JSON is interesting, let me look into that.
It seems like VACOLS/VBMS has to be forced sometimes
https://10.236.66.249/sentry/caseflow-uat/issues/280/
ActionView::Template::Error
undefined method `snamef' for nil:NilClass
Header is a known limitation of doing the page layout in Rails not React. Here is the ticket: https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/issues/2422. I'll look into two and three.
Additional error. Tried in Prod and Jane Nicholas couldn't access her cases. There were two reasons for this:
How can one tell? Does this even matter? Does the attorney care? Should they just sort by vet name?
Does not work when using browser's back button:
Only works by clicking the logo.
@mdbenjam @kierachell I will take out the AC about ordering -- we can explore this in a future enhancement ticket after we test this with users. re: your second point, ideally this would work with the browser's back button as well.
PASSED I guess
@abbyraskin I know this is closed, but wouldn't the correct order be based on currently-assigned due dates? (which are subject to revision, of course)
technically it's random for now, but I think that's a good approach.
Description
This is operation, "Let's get rid of URL hack!" Currently users have to type in the Veteran ID number in the URL in order to access Reader. Let's give them a better experience!
AC
Welcome message
h1
from styleguideTable
h2
from style guide and sentence casedprimary
button with word "New"Mockup
Note: Work assignments
Copy
NOTE - copy below is more accurate than copy in the mock!
Title: Welcome to Reader!
Body: Reader allows attorneys and judges to review and annotate Veteran claims folders. Learn more about Reader on our Help page.
Related Story
https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/issues/2342