Closed lpciferri closed 6 years ago
It looks like there're also dispositions for "Stay" (S) and a "Motion to Vacate Denied" (U). Should these be excluded from attorney checkout as well?
Also, should attorneys be prohibited from changing the disposition? Or should the dropdown be enabled and have a pre-set value?
It looks like there're also dispositions for "Stay" (S) and a "Motion to Vacate Denied" (U). Should these be excluded from attorney checkout as well?
- Yes. Let's also exclude Stay and Motion to Vacate Denied from the check out flow.
- There are currently no Stays at the Board, so we probably won't run into them. But if we do, we have a ticket out for us to fire an alert - https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/issues/4969
Also, should attorneys be prohibited from changing the disposition? Or should the dropdown be enabled and have a pre-set value?
- I was thinking that these issues and their dispositions would only exist on the Case Details screen, and not populate in the Select Dispositions screen. Only issues without dispositions, or with former dispositions 1-9 would go through the check out flow. What do you think about that?
- If that is more complex, then we can show the dispositions but prevent the attorney from editing them.
Issues that have already been decided are not required to be included in an attorney's decision. So, we should prevent already decided issues from requiring the attorney check out flow. For instance, if an issue was already granted at the RO, the attorney should still see that issue in case details, but not need to mark an issue disposition.
We learned about this through Shamil Patel's feedback from attorney check out:
AC