Open FranECross opened 3 months ago
@FranECross @davidmpickett I will get clarity on this request during a meeting with Danielle and Randi H on 7/24
@davidmpickett, the original intent of this request was to add fields for the options (and instructions) by which a Veteran can apply, such as applying online with the digital form, downloading the form and mailing it, getting assistance with the application by phone or in person, etc.
But does "how to use this form to apply" content belong to the form or to the benefit? How might we connect the form and benefit? If we are able to add these options/instructions into the model, they might also be used in other templates, such as the "About this form" template or elsewhere.
Other details The model should not expect all options for all benefits or forms.
There is a need to delineate the form used to apply vs other related forms (and the details which are available about those forms should be different)
Let's chat about this when you return and consider the best approach and next steps
Thanks, @mmiddaugh ! I'll get a meeting on the calendar with you, Dave, me and Daniel Sasser (to keep him in the loop). cc @dsasser
Bit of historical context here. We discussed these issues back in February 2023. Here's a relevant portion of the decision log.
But does "how to use this form to apply" content belong to the form or to the benefit? How might we connect the form and benefit?
Dave Conlon's opinion was that this type of information should be connected to the Form content model rather than the Benefit content model.
There is a need to delineate the form used to apply vs other related forms (and the details which are available about those forms should be different)
I had proposed a field for "Related VA Forms Guidance", but according to the decision log: "MVP will not have a new field; editors will look at "when to use" field in Forms content model and determine if this separate field will be needed." This is an example of what that field looks like on the VA Form content type:
Summary of my quick analysis across 7 different forms/benefits
FYI I did a slightly deeper audit last year
VA Benefit Content Model Taxonomy spec.xlsx
@FranECross FYI - @mmiddaugh and I talked through some of the content modeling considerations for this ticket in a 1on1 meeting today. I just updated the ticket to better reflect our current thinking. I can walk through that background in the meeting Thursday and then we can talk about options for implementation direction.
Took assignment of ticket and moved to in-progress.
Created new branch - VACMS-18163-BenefitsTaxonomy-NewApplicationProcess-field-HowtoApply Pulled fresh DB - ● λ ddev pull va --skip-files -y
Added
config/sync/field.field.taxonomy_term.va_benefits_taxonomy.field_application_process.yml
config/sync/field.storage.taxonomy_term.field_application_process.yml
Commit -m "VACMS-18163: added rich text field to VA Benefits taxonomy"
updated QA steps on pull request. Sent slack message to @davidmpickett for his 👀 on it before review
Recieved feed back from @davidmpickett on QA to incorporate into ticket before PR.
"When writing QA steps, it's best to focus on recreating the end user experience and detailing the steps a user would take to interact with the new functionality, rather than where an admin could go to verify the config.
So you'd probably want to have the steps point to va_benefits_taxonomy/overview
and then explain the steps to edit a Term and verify that the new field is functioning as intended.
It looks like the "Application process" field is currently disabled on the Form Display. That means editors wouldn't actually be able to interact with the field"
Status
[2024-08-12] [Dave] Updating ticket based on 1on1 convo with Michelle [2024-08-08] [Fran] Meeting scheduled for Tues, 8/13 to discuss this. [2024-07-31] [Fran] Fran to schedule a meeting with Michelle, Dave P, and Daniel to discuss further. [July 24, 2024] per slack thread @mmiddaugh will be reaching out to stakeholders for clarification
Description
In order to help Veterans, their caregivers, and family members navigate applying for benefits, we need to provide guidance on nuances of when and how to use different forms that are linked to a Benefit.
For instance, for programs like dental care where you apply by filling out the health care Form 10-10EZ (which is the full healthcare form, not just for dental), we understand it might not be obvious to the user/Veteran that they need to fill out the 10-10EZ form for that benefit.
The current Benefit Taxonomy build allows for connecting multiple Forms to a benefit, but doesn't have any place to add context abut those forms.
User story
AS A Veteran, their family member or caregiver who is reviewing how to apply for benefits I WANT to clearly understand what I need to do and/or fill out in order to apply SO THAT I can quickly and with minimum frustration apply for benefits.
Content modeling considerations
We allow for linking VA Forms nodes to VA Benefit terms. Once linked, any information about the Form could also be displayed in any context the Benefit is.
Content that belongs on the VA Form content type
These fields are out-of-scope for this ticket, just providing them as examples of stuff that is definitely Form-specific and not Benefit-specific
Form versions
Ways to apply
Why is the 'When to use this form' field on VA Form not enough?
One extant field on the Form type that could theoretically be pulled through to Benefits once Forms are linked is the 'When to use this form' field.
One of the main questions that needs to be resolved before this ticket moves forward is what would we add on the Benefit side that is meaningfully different from the content that exists in this field.
VA dental care = Multiple benefits with 1 form
VA health care and VA dental care are separate benefits that share an application form, 10-10EZ
The
When to use this form
field describes the primary use case of health care:Trying to add a note about dental care into that field might distract from the primary focus. Pulling through a description that focus on health care to show in the dental care context could be confusing.
Disability benefits = 1 benefit with mutiple forms
Disability benefits has a lot of different forms. Here are just three that might be considered on first application.
The Intent to file form
When to use this form
The primary form
When to use this form
The optional form's
When to use this form
Proposal
Acceptance criteria