department-of-veterans-affairs / va.gov-cms

Editor-centered management for Veteran-centered content.
https://prod.cms.va.gov
GNU General Public License v2.0
98 stars 69 forks source link

EPIC: Support facility migration iteration for new facilities that are not in VAST #1939

Closed kevwalsh closed 1 year ago

kevwalsh commented 4 years ago

Background

Scenario 1

DoD (Tricare) facilities at Lovell

There are 3-4 facilities at Lovell that are not in VAST.

Scenario 2 (not in scope)

VAMC facilities that take months to get into VAST (not in scope for this epic) Facilities don’t get into VAST for months, sometimes, so we have a number of facilities with ID like “0000”. The facilities team needs a governance, migration, and editorial experience plan for the facilities that [Slack thread]( https://dsva.slack.com/archives/C02686M6K6X/p1646921537414249) ![Teams chat about adding a facility not in VAST](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/643678/157693773-523f6d81-3f97-458a-9bc3-38c078494a00.png)

User Story or Problem Statement

<As a , I need so I can _____.>

or

<Problem description. How might we _____ ?>

Affected users and stakeholders

Hypothesis

A hypothesis may depend on a spike ticket to be completed.

We believe that _thissolution will achieve _thisoutcome. We'll know that to be true when this measurable outcome occurs.

Assumptions

(How will these assumptions be validated?)

Acceptance Criteria

Change management triage

The change represented by this user story will:

Design principles

Veteran-centered

Editor-centered

Runbook

## Labels (You can delete this section once it's complete) - [x] Issue type (red) (defaults to "Epic") - [ ] CMS subsystem (green) - [ ] CMS practice area (blue) - [x] CMS workstream (orange) - [ ] CMS-supported product (black) ### CMS Team Please check the team(s) that will do this work. - [ ] `Program` - [ ] `Platform CMS Team` - [ ] `Sitewide Crew` - [ ] `⭐️ Sitewide CMS` - [ ] `⭐️ Public Websites` - [x] `⭐️ Facilities` - [ ] `⭐️ User support`
ContentBrewmaster commented 2 years ago

@EWashb think CM will be needed this quarter?

EWashb commented 2 years ago

@ContentBrewmaster this one would be on the facilities team, not Sitewide CMS. @dsinla?

ContentBrewmaster commented 2 years ago

Sorry @EWashb linking the Collab cycle note incorrectly.

JayDarnell commented 1 year ago

@dsinla @swirtSJW all subtasks for this epic are complete and the facilities in question were manually added to production in October. Can we close this epic?

dsinla commented 1 year ago

@JayDarnell I'm going to say YES as far as I'm concerned.

JayDarnell commented 1 year ago

Closing as discussed.