department-of-veterans-affairs / va.gov-cms

Editor-centered management for Veteran-centered content.
https://prod.cms.va.gov
GNU General Public License v2.0
99 stars 69 forks source link

Change management / launch for Register for Care, Medical records, and Billing and Insurance #6881

Closed kevwalsh closed 2 years ago

kevwalsh commented 3 years ago

The change represented by epic #3151 will standardize the following pages to ensure consistency, quality, and semantic content across VAMCs:

1. Describe the change from the perspective of VA employees, in plain language. What is the employee going to experience with this change? To create the new top task pages, editors will need to add information about these services (like locations and hours) to the new pages in the CMS.

2. Explain why the change is necessary from a CMS/platform and project goal perspective. Link to screenshots if that helps tell the story. Three new content types for what we call "Top task" pages in the VAMC product: Billing and insurance, Medical records, and Register for care. Previously, this content was housed in general-purpose Benefit Detail Pages. The new pages use a mix of structured local content and nationally standardized content to give Veterans a consistent experience across all VAMCs.

3. Select the role(s) impacted by the change.

4. How will success be defined for this change? All 140 VAMCs have adopted the new top task pages.

5. How will success be measured for this change (audit, survey, other types of research, etc.)? VHA will have a dashboard to monitor which VAMCs have adopted the new pages.

6. Does the change require new or updated:

7. Will the change be tested with users before release?

8. Are there any known dependencies? Front-end

Question for discussion: Do we autogenerate non-clinical service nodes?

Sprint 50

Sprint 51

Sprint 53

Beta test

Sprint 54

Beta test

Sprint 55

Beta test

Launch!

From the editor's perspective

cmaeng commented 2 years ago

@ContentBrewmaster , not a huge deal but standard practice is to keep epics that are in progress in the "Epics in progress" column/pipeline. if putting in "In progress" instead helps you organize your work, let's discuss.

ContentBrewmaster commented 2 years ago

NP, moved back to Epics in progress.

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:01 AM Clarence Maeng @.***> wrote:

@ContentBrewmaster https://github.com/ContentBrewmaster , not a huge deal but standard practice is to keep epics that are in progress in the "Epics in progress" column/pipeline. if putting in "In progress" instead helps you organize your work, let's discuss.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-cms/issues/6881#issuecomment-1119655996, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AV6HVTWA4UELQU26RAK22L3VIUQ4FANCNFSM5HI7JLTA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

-- Denise Eisner

she / her

Content Strategist

civicactions.com http://www.civicactions.com/ | @civicactions https://twitter.com/civicactions