Open jbritt1 opened 4 years ago
Let's leave this in the icebox and either schedule some new monthly deploys, or decide to put in the work to do this.
Should we close this? I think our intention is to continue to move towards sunsetting Jenkins vs spending time on more automation around it.
Issue Description
Work was done in this pull request to make the OS Check jobs not rely so heavily on naming as it was missing instances that did not include the "-asg" portion of a
Name
tag. With that merged however, the OS Check for the utility environment fails daily due to how long it has been since Jenkins master has been deployed. This will continue to be a daily failure for that particular job until an automated method or even scheduled manual method is implemented to ensure the deployed master does not reach an age of >14 days.After some discussions, the Operations team decided that it is worth the effort and time to ensure that Jenkins is reliable and secure until such time as it is no longer needed.
As of right now, the Worker AMI gets deleted every 30 days by the AMI cleanup script which causes a Jenkins outage like clockwork. This also needs to be resolved.
Tasks
Acceptance Criteria
Relation
8321 (consider doing this work simultaneously. needs more team discussion / buy-in)