Open vhenry07 opened 3 years ago
hi @vhenry07 @kevinstachura ! I have some follow-up questions re. the Use Cases...
Please let me know. Thanks much! :)
*There seems to be a fundamental confusion between USE-cases and TEST-cases. Descriptions should be User-oriented. ** The reason there're case-specific Link-to-designs placeholders is to specify the case-relevant screens for each Use Case, not to keep repeating the root-level link.
P.S. @pjhill , if you have any suggestions to my Use Cases documentation, [especially the Use Cases are NOT Test Cases section] please let me know. Thanks much!
hi @vhenry07 @kevinstachura ! I have some follow-up questions re. the Use Cases...
- [ ] 1. What does the **User*** do or see for each Use Case? E.g. how does the User 'add "I am homeless' flag', 'Update Rep name format', or 'Add SOC/SSOC Date field...', etc.?
- [ ] 2. What are the specific design screen-links** for each Use Case?
- Homeless flag - Slide 9 (HLR Contact Info)
- Rep name - Slid3 32 (Informal Conference)
- Date field - Slide 33 (Informal Conference)
- Contact Info - Slide 14 (HLR Contact Info)
- Write-In Issues - Slide 19 (HLR Contested Issues) Please let me know. Thanks much! :)
*There seems to be a fundamental confusion between USE-cases and TEST-cases. Descriptions should be User-oriented. The reason there're case-specific Link-to-designs placeholders is to specify** the case-relevant screens for each Use Case, not to keep repeating the root-level link.
P.S. @pjhill , if you have any suggestions to my Use Cases documentation, [especially the Use Cases are NOT Test Cases section] please let me know. Thanks much!
@vhenry07 , when you open your Staging Review ticket, the QA-artifact links below should be copied there.
NOTE: I couldn't log into Staging w/ my Mac Safari. IF any of your team-members has 20-30 min. in the next few days to test that browser, please share your TestRail creds with him/her and have him/her tag me in this ticket -- I'll do a quick screenshare to get him/her started.
QA test-runs now completed. 0% Passed - 4 defects logged: #32331, #32332, #32333, #32344.
QA-artifacts:
cc @pjhill @ddzz
Re-opening for new UI-flows & 2nd round of tests.
@vhenry07 , 2nd round of test-runs now completed. Updated report link is below, and also updated in Staging Review ticket #34244:
[Product Managers: Open this ticket at least 3 Sprints (6 weeks) before you expect a Platform Staging Review of this Product/Feature. Then:
See also: Relevant VSA-QA process doc for details.
Product/Feature summary
[Provide brief summary of product/feature to be tested on Staging by VSA-QA. Also, be sure to include links to the Product/Feature Outline, Epic, Pre-Launch Checklist, and Design tickets/artifacts.]
Product-team SMEs
[if different from (or more specific than) VSA Master Org Chart]
(Leave blank to implicitly refer to VSA Master Org Chart (linked above) Design/Research: Kevin Stachura/Christian Valla Content/IA: Beth Potts Front-end: Robin Garrison Back-end: Michel McDonald QA: Tze-chiu Lei
Proposed use-cases and Staging test-accounts
[Provide specific Use Cases (all the different interactive user-flows and data-specific states) to be tested. Use this Product Use Cases template -- copy the template's markdown into a new .md file inside your Product folder [next to Product Outline file], then start updating.
IMPORTANT for authenticated products (requiring sign-in): Staging test-accounts must be provided for all authenticated scenarios, and Staging-API test-data created to match the account-specific scenarios.]
Link to Use Cases doc: [HLR v2 use cases]
How to configure this issue
Ongoing Maintenance
)vsa-authenticated-exp
,vsa-benefits
,vsa-benefits-2
,vsa-caregiver
,vsa-ebenefits
,vsa-facilities
,vsa-public-websites
, etc.)Definition of Done