Feedback Mechanism - Staging Review

[ATMiddleton]

Issue Description

Feedback Mechanism Staging Review

Tasks

• [ ] _Complete Test Scenarios
• [ ] Confirm all requirements have been met
• [ ] Ensure va.gov experience standards and va.gov platform QA standards are met
• [ ] Complete before meeting/VFS actions in the Staging Review section of their Collaboration Cycle Request ticket.
• [ ] Add test user information, tasks in .md file in repository (https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team/tree/master/products/resources-and-support/rate-tool )
• [ ] Complete styling
• [ ] Final Review

Acceptance Criteria

• [ ] Scenario 1: Complete Test Scenarios

  • Criteria 1: Test scenarios for the Feedback Mechanism Staging Review are completed.
  • Criteria 2: All test cases have been written and reviewed.
  • Criteria 3: Test data and test environment are prepared.

• [ ] Scenario 2: Confirm Requirements

  • Criteria 1: All requirements for the Feedback Mechanism Staging Review have been met.
  • Criteria 2: The functionality of the feedback mechanism is implemented correctly.
  • Criteria 3: The feedback mechanism meets the specified business rules.

• [ ] Scenario 3: Ensure Standards

  • Criteria 1: The Feedback Mechanism Staging Review adheres to va.gov experience standards.
  • Criteria 2: The Feedback Mechanism Staging Review meets va.gov platform QA standards.
  • Criteria 3: All necessary accessibility requirements are met.

• [ ] Scenario 4: Complete Before Meeting/VFS Actions

  • Criteria 1: Complete all actions mentioned in the Staging Review section of the Collaboration Cycle Request ticket.
  • Criteria 2: Ensure all necessary information and tasks are added to the .md file in the repository.
  • Criteria 3: Verify that the test user information is accurate and up-to-date.

• [ ] Scenario 5: Complete Styling

  • Criteria 1: The Feedback Mechanism Staging Review has a visually appealing design.
  • Criteria 2: The styling is consistent with the overall va.gov design system.
  • Criteria 3: All UI elements are properly aligned and formatted.

• [ ] Scenario 6: Final Review

  • Criteria 1: Conduct a final review of the Feedback Mechanism Staging Review.
  • Criteria 2: Ensure all feedback from previous reviews has been addressed.
  • Criteria 3: Verify that all acceptance criteria have been met.

• [ ] Scenario 7: Staging Review Approval

  • Criteria 1: Obtain approval from the Governance team to launch the Feedback Mechanism Staging Review.
  • Criteria 2: Ensure all necessary stakeholders have reviewed and approved the changes.

• [ ] Scenario 8: Issue Configuration

  • Criteria 1: Attach the issue to a milestone indicating the completion date.
  • Criteria 2: Attach the issue to an epic to indicate the body of work it is part of.
  • Criteria 3: Label the issue with the appropriate team(s) (e.g., product support, analytics-insights, operations, service-design, Console-Services, tools-fe).
  • Criteria 4: Label the issue with the relevant practice area(s) (e.g., backend, frontend, devops, design, research, product, ia, qa, analytics, contact center, accessibility, content).
  • Criteria 5: Label the issue with the appropriate type (e.g., bug, request, discovery, documentation, etc.).

[UXCamG]

@aubreyarcangel We are planning a second phase of research for the rate tool to gather more insight on our vets who use assistive tech and to focus in on a younger demographic. For this phase we would like to test in a staged environment. How soon would you be able to stage this?

[UXCamG]

Update from Medallia team: Once staging is cleared (Debt Portal is launched). We will work with Medallia Resources and Your team to release the Medallia Version 2 design to reassess our surveys in 508

[clantosswett]

@ATMiddleton and @UXCamG do we think this work is going to be happening anytime soon? If not, let's move this to the backlog and we can prioritize accordingly.