Open Mottie opened 8 months ago
I've got a PR open to move the Supplemental Claim primary phone code into the shared folder, but as I started working on adding a primary phone question to NOD, I encountered a few concerns.
But some background first:
In anticipation of adding a primary phone page to NOD, a PR is open to move the Supplemental Claim primary phone page to the appeals shared folder - that's working fine, but not yet merged. The concern was noted after working on NOD:
With these concerns, I think we need to further investigate and discuss them before proceeding with implementation. That, and this extra work would change the work estimate.
@Mottie moving this to the backlog.
@Mottie Do we need a spike ticket for this?
I think we need a meeting to hash out the behavior... so maybe a ticket for that?
Value Statement
As a Veteran I want to be able to choose my primary phone number So that I don't have to provide a mobile number if I don't have one
Background Context
In our Supplemental Claim form, we show both the home & mobile phone on the contact information page. Immediately after that page is a question asking if either the home of mobile phone is a primary phone number. Currently in the NOD form, we only show the mobile phone assuming that the Veteran has a mobile phone. They may already be using the same number for both the home & mobile phone, but we still want to give them a choice.
Acceptance Criteria
Tasks
Design and Build Notes
Definition of Ready
Definition of Done