Open rachelshearerux opened 9 months ago
Taking off the IA label for now, we can reassess and loop Kristin in if need be
My recommendation is to follow our guidance from Accordion here:
Additional reasons to consider something else
- Users would benefit from seeing additional context for a discrete piece of content. Use the Additional info component instead to leverage show/hide functionality, especially in a form.
- Content that can be organized under the current heading. Use the Additional info component if you have additional content that provides context and makes sense under the same heading as the content nearby.
With this in mind I think you could make the case that: A. An accordion is the appropriate choice on the Intro page because there is significant content which could very much live under a distinct heading of "How do I request personal records for someone else?". It doesn't make sense under "What types of information can I request?" and thus doesn't make sense as an Additional Info component. Requesting records for someone else is arguably as important as the other h2s on the page and at the very least an h3. This relates to the 2nd rule above. B. An additional info component might be appropriate, despite the content length, on the first step of the form because it provides additional context for a discrete piece of content, the fieldset. This relates to the 1st rule above. I would argue that if you make the 1st instance on the Intro page an Accordion that perhaps you don't need the full content on the 1st step to be repeated.
That said, I agree that the ideal route is to have a dedicated page to explaining this that we can link to.
when it’s necessary to educate folks on how to become an authorized third-party representative or power of attorney
Couldn't the Accredited representative team under Jen Bertsch do us a solid here and create that page? They are creating an entire section of the web site dedicated to helping Accredited representatives. How to become one certainly seems like content that should exist there.
Hi! Just wanted to cross-post this update I put on the content ticket associated with this intake.
Update: I submitted https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/VA.gov-team-forms/pull/1103 and shortened the copy we had for people signing forms on behalf of someone else. This is a temporary solution until we can answer a few more questions (When should someone fill out an alternate signer form versus an accredited rep form? Do we want to move this content to a static page? Is there a consistent experience for people signing on behalf of others that we can capture in a static page?)
CC @rachelshearerux for awareness!
CAIA General Collaboration
About your team
About your request
We recently went through staging review for VA Form 20-10206, Request Personal Records (staging link). Some CAIA-approved content was flagged, and we'd like support exploring a solution.
Describe your project goals
Right now: There's an additional-info component labeled “How do I request personal records for someone else?”. The content exists on the intro page, and on the first step of the form where the authenticated user self-identifies.
Based on the DS guidance, there’s too much content in the details of the component and we should either
After considering the options and discussing with Megan Zehnder (@megzehn) here's where we're at:
What is your team working on?
Digitizing VA Form 20-10206, Request personal records for users who are LOA3 authenticated and who are asking for their own personal records (ie, not a third-party or POA requester).
Content
Accessibility
IA
Other
Collaboration timeframe
We work on nearly every OCTO product and manage all unauthenticated content on VA.gov, so we will need to prioritize intake requests based on overall workload and VA and OCTO priorities.
Your timeline
Description
Since this is not a launch-blocking issue and we have stakeholders eager to see this form go live, we will go to production with the content as-is. We'd like to revise it once there's an ideal solution. Our targeted launch date is 1/9/2024.
Collaboration cycle
Phases Completed
Check any phases you’ve already completed:
Supporting artifacts
Next steps
@Terry Nichols
.TASKS