Closed shiragoodman closed 4 months ago
End-of-sprint update: Should have the work done by end of day today, but might not be done with enough time for @allison0034 to be able to PR. With the holiday tomorrow, this may carry over into the start of the next sprint. cc @shiragoodman
@briandeconinck just wanted to check in, is this ready for review?
@briandeconinck could you please also update the Description with the solution we chose? ty!
Ready for PR @allison0034 if I can catch you before your PTO!
Peer review complete... share away!
Goal is to review this in the Weekly Initiative Meeting on 7/1 with the full team.
Update 6/26: See @briandeconinck's comment below. We will be moving forward with the emoji reaction option.
Update after discussion in Slack: Emoji reaction option was resoundingly endorsed by Governance team members in the office this week. Per @shiragoodman in Slack, we'll be moving forward with that option. Outcome documented in Confluence, closing out this ticket!
User Story
As a Governance team member, I want to explore possibilities for how the Slack workflow is initiated with VFS teams so that we can weigh our options and decide to implement that solution that meets our needs.
Assignee: @briandeconinck Peer Reviewer: @allison0034
Description
In ticket #83511, Governance team proposed 3 different solutions for how we might be notified that a VFS team has scheduled a DI, MPR and/or SR in Calendly. At the weekly initiative meeting on 6/10, the team expressed a preference for a solution that posted to the #platform-governance-team channel rather than DMs --- meaning, either the Google Calendar solution or the Calendly email-to-channel solution. Subsequent testing determined that emails to the channel were the most viable option.
Now that the team has decided how they'd like to be notified, Governance team must determine how to kickoff the workflow with the VFS team and what the new process will look like. We need to decide what responsibilities fall on Governance team (and when) as well as what responsibilities fall on VFS team (and when). It would be helpful to document a user flow with both Governance and VFS responsibilities defined. Ideally, the solutions for DI, MPR, asynch MPR and SR will be the same with content being the only difference.
Similarly to ticket #83511, the purpose of this ticket is to propose a solution, however we will not be implementing the solution within this ticket. That will take place afterwards in a separate ticket.
Impacted Artifacts
Tasks
Peer Review
To be completed by peer reviewer
Acceptance Criteria
Team Notification
How to prepare this issue
Refinement
Planning
If this ticket is picked up from the Backlog mid-sprint, connect with Shira to ensure the below items are completed correctly