Closed erinrwhite closed 2 months ago
@erinrwhite Regarding Overpayment/payment language, sharing this guidance from the content team: VA content brief for VA payments, debts, and copay bills
We will note any issues with this phrasing during future studies.
All must and should changes have been addressed with One Thing Per page approach, view updates files here.
We are continuing to ideate and discuss the Consider changes.
cc: @mgleo @denisecoveyduc @HeatherRienks @charlottecesana @Tom-Davis
We plan to ask a question related to the language of overpayments/debt. Closing for now!
cc: @mgleo @charlottecesana @HeatherRienks @Tom-Davis @denisecoveyduc
Next Steps for the VFS team
@platform-governance-team-members
.Thoughts/questions
Feedback
Practice areas will document their feedback on the VFS-provided artifacts following the Must, Should, and Consider Framework. Platform Governance reviewers may also provide additional notes that don’t comment on the artifacts themselves but are important for implementation (eg. engineering/coding notes).
[x] Must: use headers to guide users through content, specifically on Debt Details pages. Headings will help users more quickly identify what they're looking at and could also help the product team when discerning the best flow of information for the page.
[x] Should: place key content in primary content section and avoid sidebar layout. This will be complex! Drawing from design of credit card websites/mobile apps might be helpful here. Thinking about the inverted pyramid of information, what's most important to least important information? My guess below - I think the hierarchy will become clearer after user testing.
[x] Consider: reorder/regroup big numbers section on Debt Detail page This section is visually appealing and the organization of information is a bit confusing. It goes back and forth between information about what is owed now, the original debt, what's already been paid, and what charges are accumulating. I think there is a more hierarchical way to reorder and visually group this information for fast understanding.
[x] Consider: test "overpayment" language I understand this debt vs. overpayment language is very sensitive! I wonder if "overpayment" (by the VA) as a concept will be confusing when juxtaposed so closely with "payments" (by the Veteran). It's two separate models - what the VA has paid, vs. what the Veteran is paying. I admittedly am not familiar with all the research/conversation on this - just wanted to note that from an IA perspective, it's a potential label mismatch (The header on the page says overpayments, while the body content is about payments).
Governance team actions