Staging Review finding: Put the list of filters in some sort of order

[shiragoodman]

Need help? Please review how to read a Staging Review ticket. Tag @platform-governance-team-members on Slack if you need further assistance.

Product Information

Team: VA BTSSS - Travel Pay Product: Travel Pay Feature: MVP

Findings details

VA.gov Experience Standard - issue: User encounters a component or pattern that isn't considered a best practice. VA.gov Experience Standard - category: Consistency Launch-blocking: No Design System review: No Collab Cycle Reviewer: @allison0034 (Design)

Description

Right now the filter list seems to be in random order. This can make it hard when users try to scan and search for words they know.

Recommended action

Put the list in some sort of order, typically alphabetical is default.

References

• Accessibility Defect Severity: N/A
• WCAG Success Criteria: N/A
• Modality: N/A
• Design System Component: N/A
• Design System Pattern or Template: N/A
• Design System Foundation: N/A
• Content Style Guide: N/A
• Context: N/A

---

Next Steps for the VFS Team

• [ ] Questions? For the most timely response, comment on Slack in your team channel tagging @platform-governance-team-members with any questions or to get help validating the issue.
• [ ] Ticket ownership: If you believe that this issue is out of scope, not your team's responsibility, or a Design System issue, comment and tag @platform-governance-team-members on your team channel in Slack to provide an explanation and who you believe is responsible. The Governance team will follow up.
• [ ] Close this ticket when the issue has been resolved or validated by your Product Owner.

[hinzed1127]

Design notes here that were based on user research:

Denied, On hold, In manual review are listed first due to users desiring to act on those the most. Other can be in alphabetical order after that. Only need to show the status for the claims that are in the user's list. No need to list status that they don't have.