QA Standards - Disability Benefits Experience Team 1 - 21-526EZ

[it-harrison]

General Information

VFS team name

Disability Benefits Experience Team 1

VFS product name

21-526EZ

VFS feature name

Toxic Exposure Page

Point of Contact/Reviewers

@it-harrison - Ian Harrison - QA

---

QA Standards

Regression Test Plan

• [x] Standard has been met

• [ ] Standard has not been met

  Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

  Test Plan

• [x] Standard has been met

• [ ] Standard has not been met

  Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

  Traceability Reports

• [x] Standard has been met

• [ ] Standard has not been met

  Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

  E2E Test Participation

• [x] Standard has been met

• [ ] Standard has not been met

  Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

  Unit Test Coverage

• Lines %: 88.46

• Functions %: 85.21

• Statements %: 88.44

• Branches %: 81.98

• [x] Standard has been met

• [ ] Standard has not been met

  Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

  ---

Next Steps for the VFS team

• [ ] Questions? For the most timely response, comment on Slack in your team channel tagging @platform-governance-team-members with any questions or to get help validating the issue.
• [ ] Close the ticket when your Product Owner determines that you have sufficiently met the QA Standards.

Platform directions

• Update "Issue Title" to be of the form "QA Standards - VFS Team - VFS Product"
• Add the VFS team, product name, and feature name
• Add your name, practice area, and GH handle under Point of Contact/Reviewers
• Complete the QA Standards section, making sure to include an "Explanation of failure to meet standard" for every Standard the product does not meet.
• Link to the Collaboration Cycle Request epic
• Add epic's milestone
• Add assignees:
  • VFS PM
  • Yourself (optional)
• Add labels:
  • VFS team label
  • VFS product label
  • QA-standards label
  • launch-blocking label if the product has failed to meet a required QA Standard

[pacerwow]

Looks like this can be closed by the VFS team if the PM accepts the results, is that correct @it-harrison ?