[CST] Rename claims for death benefits

[jacobworrell]

Value Statement

As a person looking for a status on a "Death" claim I want to see a title for those claims that is more compassionate So that I feel my loss is being respected

---

Background Context

From Julie:

In the last 30 days, DataDog indicates we showed "Claim for Death" ~450 times. Not a huge number, but there are 2 things I think we should look into. Could you log issues? What are more informative/less harsh names we could use for these claims? EP codes include: 169, 165, 299, 160, and 110. I found the following in M21 appendix B EP 110 - These are Initial Disability Compensation Claims - Seven Issues or Less, so I'm not sure what data point we use to label it "Claim for Death" EP 160 - Claim for reimbursement of burial-related expenses? - "EP 160 applies to claims for the statutory burial allowance, plot allowance, reopened claims for reconsideration of a prior decision, and claim for reimbursement of headstone, marker, or additional engraving expenses." EP 165 - Claim for reimbursement for death-related expenses? - "EP 165 applies to claims solely for compensation or pension payable as reimbursement of the expenses of last sickness and burial or claims for accrued benefits payable based on relationship when EP 140 or 190 is not involved."

Bug

• Steps to reproduce
• What is the bug?

New Feature

• Why are we doing this work?
• Epic Link

Outcome, Success Measure, KPI(S), and Tracking Link

• Add here

Design

• Add here

Enablement team (if needed)

@member of team

Engineering

• Add here

Out of scope

• Add here

Open questions

• Add here

Tasks

• [ ] Inventory all claims that currently get the "Death" label using DataDog
• [ ] Using EP codes, determine what each "Death" claim is
• [ ] Figure out a better name for each "Death" claim
• [ ] Implement new titles for each

Definition of Done

• [ ] Meets acceptance criteria
• [ ] Passed E2E testing (90% coverage)
• [ ] Passed unit testing (90% coverage)
• [ ] Passed integration testing (if applicable)
• [ ] Code reviewed (internal)
• [ ] Submitted to staging
• [ ] Team approved production verification process
• [ ] Design performs design QA and verifies the implementation matches the design spec
• [ ] Accessibility specialist performs accessibility review (in code or design)
• [ ] Engineering identifies staging users required to test and shares account and credentials with design and product
• [ ] Product performs functional QA and verifies acceptance criteria was met

Acceptance Criteria

• [ ] Each "Death" related claim gets an appropriate and compassionate title

[jstrothman]

Name change suggestion: "Claim for expenses related to death or burial" Need to verify what all is currently shown as "Claim for death" and whether that suggestion is accurate, given what all is shown as "Claim for death"

[jstrothman]

Added questions to OBA + BMT sync agenda so we can move this forward.