department-of-veterans-affairs / va.gov-team

Public resources for building on and in support of VA.gov. Visit complete Knowledge Hub:
https://depo-platform-documentation.scrollhelp.site/index.html
283 stars 204 forks source link

[CAIA Intake] DBEX-TREX: Timely and Truthful Submission Experience #92471

Open mayacarrolluxa6 opened 1 month ago

mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

Content, accessibility, information architecture (CAIA) new initiative collaboration request

We have passed the midpoint review and have conducted evaluative research on our proposed designs. Also we have reviewed internally with our team's a11y specialist. Based on our findings, we have made revisions and are seeking feedback primarily on content, and any major issues you see in terms of accessibility and information architecture. While the ask is still broad, we have identified specific areas that would benefit from your expertise in refining some rough content, captured in Figma comments, and which we can discuss further during our meeting.

About your team

Team name: Disability Benefits OCTO product owner: @emilytheis Emily Theis Product name: 526 Disability Benefits Application Product manager: @pacerwow Jared Pace Slack channel: benefits-disability-design Dedicated content writer on your team (if you have one): none Dedicated a11y specialist on your team (if you have one): @bacitracin Tracy Tran

About your initiative

Many Veterans do not have a positive experience when submitting a claim for disability compensation. There are multiple issues that describe errors, confusion, a lack of clarity, missing information, and cognitive load that isn't conducive to the level of quality we aspire to provide for Veterans. This feature focuses on improving the submission experience starting at the point when the Veteran clicks "submit" on a disability benefits application on va.gov and ending when the claim is established in VBMS and all initial doc uploads succeed or the submission process ultimately fails.

More in our feature brief.

Which of these descriptions best fits the work we’ll partner on?

Select all that apply.

What's the nature of your initiative and desired outcomes?

We are redesigning touchpoints with Veterans including screens and emails that happen after a Veteran clicks "submit" on a disability benefits application. We are considering success, backup path, and multiple failure scenarios.

We are / will be coordinating with other teams on this, notably the Veteran Facing Forms team, My VA / Authenticated Experience, and Benefits Management Tools.

Success looks like:

Collaboration timeframe

Note: We work on nearly every OCTO product and manage all unauthenticated content on VA.gov, so we will need to prioritize intake requests based on overall workload and VA and OCTO priorities.

Is this work tied to a Congressional mandate, change in law or policy, or upcoming event with a specific deadline?

Where are you at in your timeline?

We worked with CAIA earlier in the collaboration cycle (https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team/issues/83554) and are requesting to partner with CAIA again for an additional round of copy review.

We are preparing to hand off to our engineering teams for development in an upcoming sprint.

Will you release this new product incrementally (for example, release to 25% of users to start)?

If you are releasing incrementally:

Collaboration cycle

Which phases of the collaboration cycle have you completed?

Select all that apply.

Collaboration cycle ticket

If you’re going through the collaboration cycle, provide a link to your Collaboration Cycle Request:

Supporting artifacts

Provide links to any supporting artifacts that can help us better understand your initiative and begin collaboration. Include artifacts like your product outline, user flows, mockups and prototypes, or any draft content.

Next steps

### Tasks
- [ ] https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team/issues/92584
- [ ] https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team/issues/92617
mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

@mengA6 Looping in Mike for visibility.

laurwill commented 1 month ago

Hi @mayacarrolluxa6 , thanks for looping us back in. I see you're getting ready to hand off to engineering in an upcoming sprint—we'd definitely like to work on this with you before that handoff, since it connects up to so much other post-submission work across products. I just requested access to your Google cal—I'll try to find a time to sync on this next week!

mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

Hi @laurwill nice to meet you. I've granted you access to my calendar and I look forward to partnering with you on this project.

mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

@laurwill I've sent you a meeting request to sync tomorrow, please let me know if the proposed time works with your schedule. Thanks!

coforma-jamie commented 1 month ago

@mayacarrolluxa6 we left a comment for you here :)

mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

@laurwill @coforma-jamie @EvanAtCoforma

Hi Laura, Jamie, and Evan,

Thank you for your time today! I appreciate the valuable feedback and insights you shared.

Could you please provide an estimate of how long you anticipate the CAIA review will take to complete? Also, how will I be notified once your review is finished?

laurwill commented 1 month ago

Hey @mayacarrolluxa6 , just documenting here that we chatted over slack, and I added a bunch of content-related comments to the Figma file — let me know if a sync would help to discuss any of those!

mayacarrolluxa6 commented 1 month ago

Hi @laurwill our team is almost done reviewing and implementing all of the excellent feedback and suggestions. I don't think we have any follow up questions at this point, do you want us to close this issue?