department-of-veterans-affairs / va.gov-team

Public resources for building on and in support of VA.gov. Visit complete Knowledge Hub:
https://depo-platform-documentation.scrollhelp.site/index.html
283 stars 204 forks source link

[Design] 10-10CG - Explore design and content options for County field #92754

Closed jessicastump closed 1 month ago

jessicastump commented 2 months ago

Issue Description

What details are necessary for understanding the specific work or request tracked by this issue?

Benefit to the Veteran

The county field placed in the address block is unexpected per user's mental model and causes confusion.

Where

Aug 30, 2024 | Va.gov Touchbase: Meeting with VA.gov, CSP, SPS, and MuleSoft Team. This came up during the stakeholder calls that they are getting users inputing in Country not County and causing work on the back end to fix.

Why

To alleviate and reduce confusion by Veterans and Caregivers completing the online form and to reduce back end corrections needed.

What

Explore design and content options in Figma to review with team.


Tasks

Acceptance Criteria


hdjustice commented 2 months ago

Can we look at these for both short term and long term?

for County, we also talked a while back about making that a dropdown, right? now that we know we have a table for that (thanks, Income Limits export from VES!) the dropdown option is squarely on the table. this means the only location info at all is the State ID, but once the State is selected we can filter by that FWIW every single county name is unique per state. ... EXCEPT for St. Louis, which has two Counties with the same name in Missouri :sob-rotating: they differ by description: "The county of St. Louis" vs "The independent city of St. Louis"

jessicastump commented 2 months ago

Figma exploration page link

jessicastump commented 2 months ago

Figma page is updated to go with the direction of moving "county" field to it's own page and out of the address block. New hint text added to field.

SME Question: With this move to own page recommendation and the recent input issues, can the optional county field in the mailing address block also be removed (not moved, be omitted entirely)?

jessicastump commented 1 month ago

Summary posted in Slack

Update/continued chat on all things CG county fields:

Question that I forgot to ask during UX sync: given the issue the business is having with the county field ... I was wondering if there is willingness to revisit the optional county field that shows on the caregiver mailing address screens. Dare I ask if that can be removed from the online form? We will make slight adjustments to the convo guide for the upcoming caregiver study to make sure we account for asking the questions/what to watch for items around the county field to gain actionable insights from the study I think this might be better (and more aligned with the VADS address pattern) to move the county field to it's own question/page but it will be interesting to see how participants react to this field in our upcoming research!

jessicastump commented 1 month ago

@hdjustice - The figma file for the short term solution is updated with CAIA feedback incorporated - I can prep a PDF if that is preferred over a Figma link to send to CG stakeholders?

hdjustice commented 1 month ago

I think that the figma file is perfectly fine, I already talked with Matt about it yesterday too