#vebt-829 #comment Changed capitilization on SCO headers

[govcioChad]

Are you removing, renaming or moving a folder in this PR?

• [x] No, I'm not changing any folders (skip to TeamSites and delete the rest of this section)
• [ ] Yes, I'm removing, renaming or moving a folder

Summary

- (Summarize the changes that have been made to the platform)

• Updated capitalization on SCO headers

  - (If bug, how to reproduce)

• Go to SCO web page and view lower case headers

  - (What is the solution, why is this the solution)

• Capitalized headers

  - (Which team do you work for, does your team own the maintenance of this component?)

• GovCIO, we are the code owners

  - (If using a flipper, what is the end date of the flipper being required/success criteria being targeted) N/A

Related issue(s)

https://jira.devops.va.gov/browse/VEBT-829

As a...

VEBT Developer

I want…

To modify SCO title links

So that…

They comply with correct proper noun standards ( albeit VA uses them slightly differently).

Acceptance Criteria

There are 20+ changes to various SCO links listed below.
Under Handbooks -> VR&E School Certifying Official Handbook -> The description under the link has changed from Access the Employer’s Certification Handbook for OJT/APP Programs to Access the employer certification handbook for on-the-job training and apprenticeship (OJT/APP) programs. Under Handbooks -> VR&E School Certifying Official Handbook : The description under the link has changed from Access the Veteran Readiness And Employment’s Certifying Official Handbook to Access the Veteran Readiness and Employment’s Certifying Official Handbook. Under Trainings and webinars -> the following changes are made: SCO training portal changed to SCO Training Portal. Office hours and webinars changed to Office Hours and Webinars Under Sign up for trainings, webinars, and office hour updates -> Keep “office hour” but make plural “office hours”. Under Program approval information -> Change the link Federal on-the-job training/apprenticeship approval to Federal on-the-job training/apprenticeship approvals. On the description add (OJT/APP) so it looks like Discover the process and criteria for VA approval of on-the-job training and apprenticeship (OJT/APP) programs. Under Program approval information -> Change the link Covered educational institutions to [Covered Educational Institutions.|https://benefits.va.gov/gibill/resources/education_resources/school_certifying_officials/covered-educational-institutions.asp] Under Upload files to VA -> Change the link Education File upload portal to Education File Upload Portal. Under Other resources for schools -> All places where Enrollment manager should be made capitalized to Enrollment Manager. There are about 9 places that include links, headers and description, including some of the ones below. Under Other resources for schools -> Change link from Download institutions of higher learning - enrollment manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 3 pages) to Download Institutions of Higher Learning - enrollment manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 3 pages). Under Other resources for schools -> Change link from Download non-college degree programs - enrollment manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 3 pages) to Download Non-College Degree Programs - enrollment manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 3 pages) Under Other resources for schools -> Change link from Download on-the-job training/apprenticeship - enrollment manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 4 pages) to Download On-The-Job Training/Apprenticeship - Enrollment Manager Quick Start Guide (PDF, 4 pages) Enrollment manager system updates should be Enrollment Manager System Updates. Under Payment and Debt -> Change link from VA debt management center to VA Debt Management Center. Under 85/15 -> The following changes are made to the links, 35 Percent Exemption. Department of Defense Exemption. Education Service Waiver. Under Understanding Veteran education benefits -> change link from Work study site supervisor guidance to Work Study Site Supervisor Guidance.

Testing done

• Describe what the old behavior was prior to the change
• Describe the steps required to verify your changes are working as expected
• Describe the tests completed and the results
• _Exclusively stating 'Specs and automated tests passing' is NOT acceptable as appropriate testing
• Optionally, provide a link to your test plan and test execution records

Screenshots

Before:

After:

What areas of the site does it impact?

(Describe what parts of the site are impacted if code touched other areas)

Acceptance criteria

Quality Assurance & Testing

• [x] I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• [x] No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• [x] Linting warnings have been addressed
• [ ] Documentation has been updated (link to documentation *if necessary)
• [x] Screenshot of the developed feature is added
• [ ] Accessibility testing has been performed

Error Handling

• [x] Browser console contains no warnings or errors.
• [ ] Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• [ ] Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)

Authentication

• [ ] Did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected with a test user

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL) What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?