A poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize
Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack.
If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are
threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if
the attacker sends requests frequently enough.
🚨 We recommend to merge and deploy this update as soon as possible! 🚨
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
Not really a Puma bug, but @NickolasVashchenko created a gem to workaround a Ruby bug that some users of Puma may be experiencing. See README for more. (#1347)
Fix hangups with SSL and persistent connections. (#1334)
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.
All Depfu comment commands
@depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)
🚨 Your version of puma has known security vulnerabilities 🚨
Advisory: CVE-2019-16770 Disclosed: December 05, 2019 URL: https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994
Keepalive thread overload/DoS in puma
🚨 We recommend to merge and deploy this update as soon as possible! 🚨
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ puma (3.9.1 → 3.12.2) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
3.12.1
3.11.0
3.10.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase
.All Depfu comment commands