Open jochenparm opened 4 years ago
Can someone give me some feedback? It's easy enough to create a PR that fixes this, but I suppose that there might be a reason that it was implemented like this initially?
Sure, feel free to contribute.
@orsinium Can you have a look at the PR and let me know if it needs additional work?
I'm having an issue with including a couple of files that I explicitly mention in my pyproject.toml but that don't end up in the package_data list of the converted setup.py
After a lot of trial and error, I started looking into how dephell actually identifies the files to be included. It appears that you're making the assumption that files without an extension are to be ignored.
Would you consider adapting this behavior? As far as I know, it's not bad practice to allow for files without an extension to be packaged up.
https://github.com/dephell/dephell_discover/blob/2ca2890270eb5c84ca4b9f46d00f19e47d5e2cac/dephell_discover/_root.py#L68